Changing peer review practices: transforming roles and future challenges.
作者信息
Horbach Serge P J M, Overgaard Søren
机构信息
Institute for Science in Society, Radboud University, Netherlands.
Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
出版信息
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;96:537-539. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44353.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Changing peer review practices: transforming roles and future challenges.改变同行评审做法：转变角色与未来挑战。
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;96:537-539. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.44353.
2
Systematizing peer recovery support services for substance use disorder: a taxonomy for measuring recovery milestones.系统化物质使用障碍的同伴康复支持服务：衡量康复里程碑的分类法。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 12;13:1529078. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1529078. eCollection 2025.
3
Experiences of Certified Peer Support Specialist Providing Formal Peer Support in Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.认证同伴支持专家在精神卫生服务中提供正式同伴支持的经验：系统评价和元综合。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;33(6):1988-2004. doi: 10.1111/inm.13415. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
Non-profit breastfeeding organisations' peer support provision in areas of socio-economic deprivation in the UK: A meta-ethnography.英国社会经济贫困地区非营利母乳喂养组织的同伴支持服务提供情况：荟萃民族志研究。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Jan;18(1):e13271. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13271. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Systematic review of menstrual health and hygiene in Nepal employing a social ecological model.尼泊尔基于社会生态学模型的月经健康和卫生系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01456-0.
6
Effects of peer-delivered self-management, recovery education interventions for individuals with severe and enduring mental health challenges: A meta-analysis.同伴提供的自我管理、康复教育干预对患有严重且持久心理健康问题个体的影响：一项荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Feb;30(1):54-73. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12853. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
7
Transforming the Patient-Provider Relationship Through Digitalized Peer Support in Japan.通过日本数字化的同伴支持转变医患关系。
Health Syst Reform. 2024 Dec 17;10(2):2392306. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2024.2392306. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
8
Peering into the literature: A systematic review of the roles of people who inject drugs in harm reduction initiatives.审视文献：对注射吸毒者在减少伤害举措中作用的系统评价
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jun 1;151:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
9
Caregiver Peer Support for Families of Autistic Children in France.法国针对自闭症儿童家庭的照顾者同伴支持
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Jul;51(4):e70123. doi: 10.1111/cch.70123.
10
Nurses' roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: A systematic review.护士在通过实施最佳实践改变护理行为中的作用：一项系统综述。
Health SA. 2022 May 25;27:1776. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1776. eCollection 2022.
本文引用的文献
1
AI is transforming peer review - and many scientists are worried.人工智能正在改变同行评审——许多科学家对此感到担忧。
Nature. 2025 Mar;639(8056):852-854. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-00894-7.
2
The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the External Review of Scientific Manuscripts and Editorial Peer Review Processes.生成式人工智能对科学手稿外部评审和编辑同行评审过程的影响。
Am J Pathol. 2024 Oct;194(10):1802-1806. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
3
Use of artificial intelligence and the future of peer review.人工智能的应用与同行评审的未来。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 May 3;2(5):qxae058. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae058. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Adapting to the rapidly moving target artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly publishing.适应学术出版领域快速发展的人工智能这一不断变化的目标。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Dec 27;94:625. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.34900.
5
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是加剧偏见？关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的思考与建议。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 18;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.
6
The limitations to our understanding of peer review.我们对同行评审理解的局限性。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Apr 30;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1. eCollection 2020.
7
Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review.同行评议偏见：批判性评论。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):670-676. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.004. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
8
The changing forms and expectations of peer review.同行评审不断变化的形式与期望。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Sep 20;3:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5. eCollection 2018.
9
Peer review: Troubled from the start.同行评审：从一开始就麻烦不断。
Nature. 2016 Apr 21;532(7599):306-8. doi: 10.1038/532306a.
10
CREDIBILITY, PEER REVIEW, AND NATURE, 1945-1990.可信度、同行评审与《自然》，1945 - 1990年
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Sep 20;69(3):337-52. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2015.0029.
Zotero 插件