Dharel Dinesh, Paudel Deepak, Muhajarine Nazeem
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251347717. doi: 10.1177/17455057251347717. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
An alarming observation from high-volume obstetric facilities in Nepal indicating a decreased institutional delivery rate and increased institutional neonatal mortality rate after the initial nationwide lockdown signaled the adverse population-level impact of the pandemic on the national trajectory of neonatal survival.
We aimed to estimate the impact of change in institutional delivery coverage on cause-specific neonatal mortality during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Nepal.
Modeling-based study.
We used the open-access Lives Saved Tool, based on a linear deterministic mathematical model validated for estimating cause-specific neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries, to estimate the number of additional neonatal lives saved and neonatal mortality rates. Using coverage change in institutional delivery rates as a proxy for interventions during childbirth, we compared the estimates using 'reported' coverage change during the pandemic with the 'targets' per Nepal Every Newborn Action Plan.
The projected number of additional neonatal lives saved when the pandemic hit the hardest (Nepalese fiscal year 2020-2021) when national annual institutional delivery rate reportedly decreased was lower (104; 95% confidence interval: 69-148) compared to the target scenario (222; 95% confidence interval: 152-313). However, in the next year 2021-2022 when the institutional delivery rate increased, the number was higher (926; 95% confidence interval: 643-1295) compared to target scenario (329; 95% confidence interval: 226-466). The trajectory of the projected neonatal mortality rate per 1000 live births reversed (increased to 20.18) in 2020-2021 compared to 20.11 in 2019-2020 and then tracked down to 18.75 in 2021-2022. Most newborn lives would be saved from asphyxia, sepsis, and prematurity-related complications. Neonatal resuscitation, thermal protection, and cord care are the top three lifesaving interventions during childbirth.
Neonatal survival in Nepal was adversely impacted during the peak of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with a favorable bounce back next year, based on the Lives Saved Tool projection per change in institutional delivery coverage.
尼泊尔多家大型产科机构的一项惊人观察表明,在全国首次实施封锁后,机构分娩率下降,机构新生儿死亡率上升,这预示着疫情对该国新生儿生存轨迹产生了不利的人口层面影响。
我们旨在估计2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间尼泊尔机构分娩覆盖率变化对特定原因新生儿死亡率的影响。
基于模型的研究。
我们使用了开放获取的“挽救生命工具”,该工具基于一个经过验证的线性确定性数学模型,用于估计低收入和中等收入国家特定原因的新生儿死亡率,以估计额外挽救的新生儿生命数量和新生儿死亡率。我们将机构分娩率的覆盖率变化用作分娩期间干预措施的替代指标,将大流行期间“报告的”覆盖率变化的估计值与尼泊尔《每个新生儿行动计划》的“目标”进行比较。
据报道,在大流行最严重的时期(尼泊尔2020 - 2021财政年度),全国年度机构分娩率下降,预计额外挽救的新生儿生命数量(104例;95%置信区间:69 - 148)低于目标情景(222例;95%置信区间:152 - 313)。然而,在接下来的2021 - 2022年,当机构分娩率上升时,这一数字(926例;95%置信区间:643 - 1295)高于目标情景(329例;95%置信区间:226 - 466)。每1000例活产预计新生儿死亡率的轨迹在2020 - 2021年发生逆转(升至20.18),而2019 - 2020年为20.11,然后在2021 - 2022年降至18.75。大多数新生儿生命将从窒息、败血症和早产相关并发症中挽救过来。新生儿复苏、保暖和脐带护理是分娩期间最重要的三项挽救生命的干预措施。
根据“挽救生命工具”对机构分娩覆盖率变化的预测,尼泊尔的新生儿生存情况在2019年冠状病毒病大流行高峰期受到不利影响,但在次年出现了良好的反弹。