Habib Joseph R, Hidalgo Salinas Camila, Berger Natalie F, Rompen Ingmar F, Campbell Brady A, Kinny-Köster Benedict, Andel Paul C M, Hewitt D Brock, Kaiser Jörg, Billeter Adrian T, Perera Rafael, Morgan Katherine, Daamen Lois A, Javed Ammar A, Müller-Stich Beat P, Besselink Marc G, He Jin, Molenaar I Quintus, Büchler Markus W, Wolfgang Christopher L, Loos Martin, Sacks Greg D
Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17810-y.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic cancer was previously categorized into tubular, colloid, and oncocytic subtypes. Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPN) has long been associated with superior prognosis/indolent behavior, however, there is discordant emerging evidence. This study aimed to investigate this conflicting literature.
Patients with resected IOPN-derived and IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer were identified from six international centers. Log-rank tests compared time to (TtR) and survival after (SAR) recurrence and five-year overall survival (OS). A multivariable mixed model was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95%CI) for five-year survival.
Of 879 patients, 20 (2%) had IOPN-derived pancreatic cancer. Most patients had T1 (55%) or N0 (70%) disease. IOPN and colloid IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers had similar recurrence rates (25% vs. 24%), while recurrence was more common in tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer (42%, p < 0.001). IOPN-derived pancreatic cancer displayed a longer TtR and SAR compared to colloid and tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers. IOPN-derived and colloid IPMN-derived cancers demonstrated significantly lower 5-year mortality risks compared to tubular IPMN-derived cancers (74% and 27% risk reduction, respectively; p < 0.05).
IOPN-derived pancreatic cancers have excellent OS. However, some patients have poor prognostic factors and are at risk for both local and systemic recurrence. Given more indolent disease progression given delayed TtR and prolonged SAR compared to colloid and tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers, there may be a role for prolonged surveillance.
导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)衍生的胰腺癌以前被分类为管状、黏液性和嗜酸性亚型。导管内嗜酸性乳头状肿瘤(IOPN)长期以来被认为预后较好/行为惰性,但目前出现了不一致的证据。本研究旨在调查这一相互矛盾的文献。
从六个国际中心识别出接受手术切除的IOPN衍生和IPMN衍生的胰腺癌患者。对数秩检验比较复发时间(TtR)、复发后生存时间(SAR)和五年总生存率(OS)。使用多变量混合模型确定五年生存率的风险比(HR)及其置信区间(95%CI)。
在879例患者中,20例(2%)患有IOPN衍生的胰腺癌。大多数患者为T1期(55%)或N0期(70%)疾病。IOPN和黏液性IPMN衍生的胰腺癌复发率相似(25%对24%),而管状IPMN衍生的胰腺癌复发更常见(42%,p<0.001)。与黏液性和管状IPMN衍生的胰腺癌相比,IOPN衍生的胰腺癌TtR和SAR更长。与管状IPMN衍生的癌症相比,IOPN衍生和黏液性IPMN衍生癌症的5年死亡风险显著降低(分别降低74%和27%;p<0.05)。
IOPN衍生的胰腺癌具有良好的总生存率。然而,一些患者具有不良预后因素,存在局部和全身复发风险。与黏液性和管状IPMN衍生的胰腺癌相比,由于TtR延迟和SAR延长,疾病进展较为惰性,因此可能需要延长监测时间。