• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入术:早期和中期结果

Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation: Early- and Mid-Term Outcomes.

作者信息

Chen Joshua R, Shah Vishal N, Koeneman Scott H, King Colin, McGee Jacqueline, Plestis Konstadinos

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Aorta (Stamford). 2025 Apr;13(2):46-55. doi: 10.1055/a-2642-8919. Epub 2025 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1055/a-2642-8919
PMID:40683245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12472812/
Abstract

Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is an alternative to traditional valve-replacing root replacement. We examined early- and mid-term outcomes after VSRR.We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained aortic registry. All patients undergoing VSRR from 2005 to 2023 were included. Statistical analysis was performed in R version 4.3.1. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe mortality and freedom from mortality, aortic insufficiency (AI) > 1 + , and aortic valve-related reoperation.Eighty-one patients underwent VSRR, 59 (72.8%) through full sternotomy (FS) and 22 (27.2%) through upper hemisternotomy. There were no cases of AI > 1+ in the perioperative period, 1 (1.2%) stroke, and no in-hospital mortality. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay were 3 and 7 days, respectively. Mean follow-up time was 8 years. Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 100, 96.6, and 94.4%, respectively. Composite freedom from reoperation, recurrence, or mortality at 1, 5, and 10 years was 98.8, 92.1, and 87.3%, respectively.With careful preoperative selection, VSRR is a durable procedure for patients with aortic root aneurysm.

摘要

保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术(VSRR)是传统瓣膜置换根部置换术的一种替代方法。我们研究了VSRR后的早期和中期结果。我们对前瞻性维护的主动脉登记处进行了回顾性研究。纳入了2005年至2023年期间所有接受VSRR的患者。在R 4.3.1版本中进行统计分析。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线描述死亡率和无死亡、主动脉瓣关闭不全(AI)>1+以及主动脉瓣相关再次手术的情况。81例患者接受了VSRR,59例(72.8%)通过全胸骨切开术(FS),22例(27.2%)通过上半胸骨切开术。围手术期无AI>1+的病例,1例(1.2%)发生卒中,无院内死亡。重症监护病房平均住院时间和住院时间分别为3天和7天。平均随访时间为8年。1年、5年和10年的全因死亡率分别为100%、96.6%和94.4%。1年、5年和10年再次手术、复发或死亡的综合无事件率分别为98.8%、92.1%和87.3%。经过仔细的术前选择,VSRR对主动脉根部瘤患者是一种持久的手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbb/12472812/8e4c9dbf2841/10-1055-a-2642-8919-i240004-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbb/12472812/c1273118e017/10-1055-a-2642-8919-i240004-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbb/12472812/8e4c9dbf2841/10-1055-a-2642-8919-i240004-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbb/12472812/c1273118e017/10-1055-a-2642-8919-i240004-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bbb/12472812/8e4c9dbf2841/10-1055-a-2642-8919-i240004-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation: Early- and Mid-Term Outcomes.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部再植入术:早期和中期结果
Aorta (Stamford). 2025 Apr;13(2):46-55. doi: 10.1055/a-2642-8919. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Revisiting ascending aortic resection in the elective valve-sparing root replacement: assessing the benefits and necessity of hemiarch replacement at three centres†.重新审视择期保留瓣膜根部置换术中升主动脉切除术:评估三个中心半弓置换术的益处和必要性†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Feb 4;67(2). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf006.
4
Surgical management of aortic root disease in Marfan syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.马凡综合征主动脉根部疾病的外科治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2011 Jun;97(12):955-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.210286. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
Valve-sparing root replacement: How old is too old?保留瓣膜的根部置换术:年龄多大算过大?
JTCVS Open. 2025 Mar 14;25:10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.020. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Aortic valve-sparing operation at concomitant aortic root and total aortic arch replacement.同期主动脉根部及全主动脉弓置换时保留主动脉瓣手术
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02150-1.
7
Valve-Sparing Root Replacement in Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves: Long-Term Outcomes Into the Second Decade.二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣保留瓣膜的根部置换术:进入第二个十年的长期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.05.012.
8
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限与全胸骨切开术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3.
9
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
10
Mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair using an anatomically shaped internal annuloplasty ring.采用解剖形状内环成形术治疗主动脉瓣修复的中期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Dec 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad395.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient selection for aortic valve-sparing operations.主动脉瓣保留手术的患者选择
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 31;12(3):259-261. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs1-19. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
Valve-sparing David procedure minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome.保留瓣膜的David手术微创入路不影响手术效果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 14;9:966126. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126. eCollection 2022.
3
David Procedure: A 21-year Experience With 300 Patients.大卫手术:300 例患者 21 年经验。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jun;115(6):1403-1410. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.04.058. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
Valve-sparing versus valve-replacing aortic root replacement in patients with aortic root aneurysm.保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部替换术与主动脉根部瘤患者的主动脉瓣置换术。
J Card Surg. 2022 Jul;37(7):1947-1956. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16473. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
How We Perform a David Procedure With an Upper Hemisternotomy Approach.经上中胸骨切开术入路施行 David 手术的方法。
Innovations (Phila). 2021 Nov-Dec;16(6):545-552. doi: 10.1177/15569845211045965.
6
Aortic valve-sparing root replacement with Tirone E. David's reimplantation technique: single-centre 25-year experience.保留主动脉瓣根部的主动脉瓣替换术采用 Tirone E. David 的再植入技术:单中心 25 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):642-648. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab136.
7
Fifteen Years of Aortic Valve-sparing Root Replacement and Impact of Eccentric Jets on Late Outcomes.主动脉瓣保留型根部替换术 15 年:偏心射流对晚期结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Dec;112(6):1901-1907. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
8
Two decades of valve-sparing root reimplantation in tricuspid aortic valve: impact of aortic regurgitation and cusp repair.二十年来三尖瓣主动脉瓣保留根部再植入术:主动脉瓣反流和瓣叶修复的影响。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 May 8;59(5):1069-1076. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa427.
9
Predictors of Aortic Valve Repair Failure.主动脉瓣修复失败的预测因素。
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Jun;14(3):199-208. doi: 10.1177/1556984519845905. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Tirone on Tirone David operation and types.蒂罗内谈蒂罗内·大卫手术及类型。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):66-69. doi: 10.1007/s11748-017-0819-4. Epub 2017 Aug 28.