Yang Hui, Qiu Guangping
Interventional Therapy Department, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):3599-3610. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-167. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
The efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) complicated by arterioportal shunts (APS) was unsatisfactory. Developed systemic therapies can synergize with TACE, potentially reducing APS recanalization and enhancing patient benefits. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a combination therapy regimen that includes TACE, lenvatinib, and sintilimab (TACE-L-S) versus TACE monotherapy in uHCC patients with APS.
After reviewing hospital records, this retrospective study enrolled 96 patients: 51 in the TACE-L-S group and 45 in the TACE group. We utilized the Chi-squared test to analyze tumor response, changes in APS grades, APS recanalization rates, and adverse events (AEs) between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to compare median progression-free survival (mPFS). Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors influencing mPFS, whereas logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors influencing APS recanalization rates.
The objective response rate (ORR) was 68.6% in the TACE-L-S group and 37.8% in the TACE group (P=0.002). The TACE-L-S group had better mPFS compared to the TACE group (168 111 days, P<0.001), influenced by the treatment option, hepatic vein invasion, and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) type. Following the first TACE procedure, APS grades were similar between the groups; however, at 3 months after the first TACE, the TACE-L-S group demonstrated better APS grades. APS recanalization rates also differed significantly between the groups (24.4% 53.8%, P=0.006), influenced by the treatment option, preoperative APS grade, and PVTT type. AEs associated with TACE-L-S were tolerable.
For uHCC patients with APS, TACE-L-S may be a kind of effective and safe therapy.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗合并动门静脉分流(APS)的不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)疗效欠佳。已开发的全身治疗可与TACE协同作用,可能减少APS再通并增加患者获益。本研究的目的是评估和比较在合并APS的uHCC患者中,包含TACE、仑伐替尼和信迪利单抗的联合治疗方案(TACE-L-S)与TACE单药治疗的疗效和安全性。
在查阅医院记录后,这项回顾性研究纳入了96例患者:TACE-L-S组51例,TACE组45例。我们使用卡方检验分析两组之间的肿瘤反应、APS分级变化、APS再通率和不良事件(AE)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析比较中位无进展生存期(mPFS)。进行Cox回归分析以确定影响mPFS的因素,而进行逻辑回归分析以评估影响APS再通率的因素。
TACE-L-S组的客观缓解率(ORR)为68.6%,TACE组为37.8%(P = 0.002)。受治疗方案、肝静脉侵犯和门静脉癌栓(PVTT)类型影响,TACE-L-S组的mPFS优于TACE组(168±111天,P < 0.001)。首次TACE术后,两组的APS分级相似;然而,在首次TACE术后3个月,TACE-L-S组的APS分级更好。两组的APS再通率也有显著差异(24.4% vs 53.8%,P = 0.006),受治疗方案、术前APS分级和PVTT类型影响。与TACE-L-S相关的AE可耐受。
对于合并APS的uHCC患者,TACE-L-S可能是一种有效且安全的治疗方法。