Bagheri Kian, Shekhar Adithya, Kwok Eric, Dungy Danton, Stewart Susan L, Jamali Amir A
Joint Preservation Institute Walnut Creek California USA.
The Dungy Orthopedic Center Chandler Arizona USA.
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 18;12(3):e70335. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70335. eCollection 2025 Jul.
PURPOSE: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been utilised in the last few decades as a conservative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). We sought to evaluate the patient reported outcomes at specific intermediate term endpoints comparing PRP to HA through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also sought to determine the effect of platelet concentration on the relative outcomes between PRP and HA. METHODS: The Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases were searched for terms related to PRP and osteoarthritis. RCTs comparing PRP and HA in the treatment of knee OA were selected. A total of 26 trials with 1650 knees were included. The two treatments were compared based on the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale (VAS) at specific time points of baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. RESULTS: PRP had a significant benefit over HA based on the WOMAC at 6 months and at 12 months. It also had a significant benefit over HA on the VAS at 6 months and at 12 months. When limiting the analysis to 6 month follow-up and separating the studies by platelet count, PRP had a statistically significant benefit over HA for platelet counts corresponding to 'greater than baseline to 1,250,000 platelets/μL' for the WOMAC score and platelet counts corresponding to 'between 750,000 and 1,250,000 platelets/μL' for the VAS score. CONCLUSIONS: When taken as a whole, PRP demonstrates a significantly superior clinical result compared to HA at 6 months and 12 months. These findings must be considered in light of the numerous preparation protocols and PRP classifications detailed in this report for the included studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, systematic review of Level-1 randomised controlled studies.
目的:在过去几十年中,富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)已被用作膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的保守治疗方法。我们试图通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较PRP与HA在特定中期终点时患者报告的结局。我们还试图确定血小板浓度对PRP和HA相对结局的影响。 方法:在Embase、PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中搜索与PRP和骨关节炎相关的术语。选择比较PRP和HA治疗膝关节OA的RCT。共纳入26项试验,涉及1650个膝关节。在基线、6个月和12个月的特定时间点,根据西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)对两种治疗进行比较。 结果:基于WOMAC,PRP在6个月和12个月时比HA有显著优势。在6个月和12个月时,PRP在VAS上也比HA有显著优势。当将分析限制在6个月随访,并按血小板计数对研究进行分类时,对于WOMAC评分,血小板计数对应于“高于基线至1250000个血小板/μL”,对于VAS评分,血小板计数对应于“750000至1250000个血小板/μL”时,PRP比HA有统计学显著优势。 结论:总体而言,PRP在6个月和12个月时显示出比HA显著更好的临床结果。鉴于本报告中为纳入研究详细介绍的众多制备方案和PRP分类,必须考虑这些发现。 证据水平:1级,对1级随机对照研究的系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Invest Radiol. 2023-5-1
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020-9-11