Suppr超能文献

白细胞缺乏或多次注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎相比哪个更有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Are leukocyte-poor or multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma more effective than hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Joint Diseases, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 110 Deokan-ro, Gwangmyeong-si, Gyeonggi-do, 14353, South Korea.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3879-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04637-5. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity as a treatment option for knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy remains controversial. The optimal leukocyte concentration and number of injections have not been well investigated. This study was, therefore, designed to provide clinical evidence on the leukocyte concentration and number of intra-articular injections of PRP via a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched and RCTs comparing PRP and hyaluronic acid (HA) for treating knee osteoarthritis were included. Clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and adverse reactions, were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 138 studies were screened, of which 21 level 1 RCTs (2086 knees; 1077 PRP and 1009 HA) were included. PRPs showed significant improvement in pain according to the VAS score compared to HA at 6 and 12 months, regardless of leukocyte concentration. Both single and multiple injections of PRP improved pain better than HA at 12 months. Regarding function, both single and multiple injections of leukocyte-poor PRP and leukocyte-rich PRP led to significantly better improvement in total WOMAC score compared with HA at 6 months. There was no significant difference in procedure-related knee pain or swelling between the PRP and HA groups. Leukocyte-rich PRP had a significantly higher odds ratio for procedure-related knee pain or swelling compared to HA (odds ratio, 3.3 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-10.2], P = .037).

CONCLUSION

Based on evidence from Level 1 studies, intra-articular injection of PRP improves pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis for up to 12 months and is superior to HA, regardless of leukocyte concentration or number of injections. The findings of this study support the routine clinical use of intra-articular injections of PRP for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, regardless of the type and frequency of PRP injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Meta-analysis of level I studies.

摘要

简介

富含血小板的血浆(PRP)作为治疗膝骨关节炎的一种选择已越来越受欢迎;然而,其疗效仍存在争议。最佳白细胞浓度和注射次数尚未得到充分研究。因此,本研究旨在通过对随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析,为 PRP 关节内注射的白细胞浓度和注射次数提供临床证据。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、CINAHL 和 Scopus 数据库,纳入比较 PRP 和透明质酸(HA)治疗膝骨关节炎的 RCT。评估临床结局,包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和不良反应。

结果

共筛选出 138 项研究,其中纳入 21 项 1 级 RCT(2086 膝;1077 例 PRP 和 1009 例 HA)。无论白细胞浓度如何,PRP 在 VAS 评分方面均较 HA 在 6 和 12 个月时疼痛改善更显著。单次和多次 PRP 注射在 12 个月时均较 HA 改善疼痛效果更好。关于功能,白细胞贫乏 PRP 和白细胞丰富 PRP 的单次和多次注射在 6 个月时与 HA 相比,总 WOMAC 评分的改善均显著更好。PRP 和 HA 组之间在与操作相关的膝关节疼痛或肿胀方面无显著差异。与 HA 相比,白细胞丰富的 PRP 与操作相关的膝关节疼痛或肿胀的可能性更高(比值比,3.3[95%置信区间,1.1-10.2],P=0.037)。

结论

基于 1 级研究证据,关节内注射 PRP 可改善膝骨关节炎患者长达 12 个月的疼痛和功能,且优于 HA,无论白细胞浓度或注射次数如何。本研究结果支持常规临床使用关节内注射 PRP 治疗膝骨关节炎,无论 PRP 注射的类型和频率如何。

证据等级

I 级研究的荟萃分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验