Tverdal Cathrine, Reiner Andrew, Helseth Eirik, Hellstrøm Torgeir, Manskow Unn Sollid, Aarhus Mads, Skogen Karoline, Rønning Pål, Netteland Dag Ferner
Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 4;16:1599229. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1599229. eCollection 2025.
Falls are the leading cause of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in high-income countries, and globally, the incidence of fall-related injuries is projected to rise. In this study, we compare TBI resulting from stair-related falls (SRFs) to falls from standing height (FSH), analyzing their epidemiology and outcomes.
In a single-center, registry-based cohort study using the Oslo TBI Registry-Neurosurgery (OTBIR-N), we identified adults (≥18 years) admitted to Oslo University Hospital with TBI from either SRFs or FSH between 2015 and 2022. Epidemiology and outcome measures were compared between the two groups, and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate the adjusted effect of the fall mechanisms on dichotomized functional outcome (Glasgow outcome score (GOS) 1-3 vs. GOS 4-5).
A total of 1,432 patients with a median age of 71 years were included. SRFs represented 25%, while FSH represented 52% of all fall-related TBIs. SRF patients were generally younger and healthier, with a higher frequency of moderate to severe TBI than FSH patients (53% vs. 31%; < 0.001). SRFs also occurred more often during evenings and nights, on weekends, and were more often related to alcohol influence (58% vs. 22%; p < 0.001). Both fall types resulted in unfavorable functional outcomes (GOS 1-3) for a substantial proportion of patients (37% in SRFs and 42% in FSH; = 0.066). When adjusting for covariates in the multivariable logistic regression model, there was a tendency of SRFs being associated with unfavorable outcomes compared to FSH, but the effect was not statistically significant (OR 1.43, 95%CI 0.97-2.12; = 0.073).
SRFs represented a considerable proportion of fall-related TBIs and were associated with poor outcomes in a substantial proportion of patients. Targeted public awareness campaigns addressing the risks associated with staircases, especially when combined with alcohol influence, seem warranted to prevent such injuries.
在高收入国家,跌倒 是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的主要原因,并且在全球范围内,与跌倒相关的损伤发生率预计将会上升。在本研究中,我们将楼梯相关跌倒(SRF)导致的TBI与站立高度跌倒(FSH)导致的TBI进行比较,分析它们的流行病学特征和结局。
在一项基于奥斯陆TBI神经外科注册数据库(OTBIR-N)的单中心队列研究中,我们确定了2015年至2022年间因SRF或FSH导致TBI而入住奥斯陆大学医院的成年人(≥18岁)。比较两组之间的流行病学和结局指标,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估跌倒机制对二分法功能结局(格拉斯哥结局评分(GOS)1-3与GOS 4-5)的调整效应。
共纳入1432例患者,中位年龄为71岁。SRF占所有与跌倒相关的TBI的25%,而FSH占52%。SRF患者通常更年轻、更健康,中度至重度TBI的发生率高于FSH患者(53%对31%;<0.001)。SRF在晚上和夜间、周末更常发生,并且更常与酒精影响有关(58%对22%;p<0.001)。两种跌倒类型均导致相当比例的患者出现不良功能结局(GOS 1-3)(SRF中为37%,FSH中为42%;=0.066)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中对协变量进行调整后,与FSH相比,SRF有与不良结局相关的趋势,但该效应无统计学意义(OR 1.43,95%CI 0.97-2.12;=0.073)。
SRF占与跌倒相关的TBI的相当比例,并且在相当比例的患者中与不良结局相关。开展有针对性的公众宣传活动,强调与楼梯相关的风险,尤其是在与酒精影响相结合时,似乎有必要预防此类损伤。