Khajuria Rahul, Jindal Ankur, Sharma Manoj Kumar, Arora Vinod, Vyas Ashish Kumar, Kumar Guresh, Sarin Shiv Kumar
Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Amrita Research Center, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003650.
Carvedilol is effective in the prevention of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and high-risk varices. Although it reduces drivers of clinical decompensation (portal pressure, systemic inflammation, and bacterial translocation), the data on its use for prevention of ascites-related complications are limited.
In this open-label randomized control tria, patients having uncomplicated new-onset ascites with no or low-risk esophageal varices were randomized (n = 104) to receive carvedilol (group A, n = 52) or no carvedilol (group B, n = 52) in addition to standard treatment. The composite primary outcome was incidence of any ascites-related complications, namely, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome acute kidney injury, refractory ascites, or severe hyponatremia at 1 year. The secondary outcomes included need for paracentesis, change in hepatic venous pressure gradient, Child-Turcotte-Pugh, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and mortality at 1 year.
The baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups, with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease as the commonest etiology (overall 41.3%) followed by alcohol-associated liver disease (21.2%). Patients in group A compared with group B had lower incidence of complicated ascites (38.5% vs 67.3%; P = 0.03), mainly related to reduced incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (34.6% vs 63.4%, P = 0.003), refractory ascites, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis along with a significant reduction in HVPG (14.89 ± 2.8 to 11.86 ± 1.9 mm Hg [ P < 0.05]) and lesser progression in variceal grade (21.8% vs 53.1%, P = 0.009). Patients in group A than B demonstrated better ascites resolution (61.5% vs 31.8%, P = 0.01) and fewer large volume paracentesis sessions (26.9% vs 57.6%; P = 0.01). At 1 year, patients in group B had higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores (9.31 ± 1.43 vs 8.17 ± 1.7, P = 0.001). Use of carvedilol was associated with lower 1 year mortality (9.1% vs 24.2%, P = 0.05). No patient had treatment-related severe adverse events.
Administration of carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis with new-onset uncomplicated ascites without high-risk varices is safe and prevents further ascites-related complications, with reduced need for large volume paracentesis and improved survival.
卡维地洛对预防肝硬化和高危静脉曲张患者出血有效。尽管它能降低临床失代偿的驱动因素(门静脉压力、全身炎症和细菌移位),但其用于预防腹水相关并发症的数据有限。
在这项开放标签随机对照试验中,将新发无并发症腹水且无或低风险食管静脉曲张的患者(n = 104)随机分为两组,除标准治疗外,A组(n = 52)接受卡维地洛治疗,B组(n = 52)不接受卡维地洛治疗。复合主要结局是1年内任何腹水相关并发症的发生率,即自发性细菌性腹膜炎、肝肾综合征急性肾损伤、顽固性腹水或严重低钠血症。次要结局包括腹腔穿刺需求、肝静脉压力梯度变化、Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分、终末期肝病模型评分以及1年死亡率。
两组患者的基线特征具有可比性,代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病是最常见病因(总体占41.3%),其次是酒精性肝病(21.2%)。与B组相比,A组患者并发腹水的发生率较低(38.5%对67.3%;P = 0.03),主要与急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率降低有关(34.6%对63.4%,P = 0.003)、顽固性腹水和自发性细菌性腹膜炎,同时肝静脉压力梯度显著降低(从14.89±2.8降至11.86±1.9 mmHg [P < 0.05]),静脉曲张分级进展较小(21.8%对53.1%,P = 0.009)。A组患者的腹水消退情况优于B组(61.5%对31.8%,P = 0.01),且大量腹腔穿刺次数较少(26.9%对57.6%;P = 0.01)。1年时,B组患者的Child-Turcotte-Pugh评分较高(9.31±1.43对8.17±1.7,P = 0.001)。使用卡维地洛与1年死亡率较低相关(9.1%对24.2%,P = 0.05)。没有患者发生与治疗相关的严重不良事件。
对于新发无并发症腹水且无高危静脉曲张的肝硬化患者,给予卡维地洛是安全的,可预防进一步的腹水相关并发症,减少大量腹腔穿刺的需求并提高生存率。