Linde Philipp, Lang Frauke, Matuschek Christiane, Schlenter Marsha, Scafa Davide, Neuwahl Judith, Mäurer Matthias, Oertel Michael, Dapper Hendrik, Fokas Emmanouil, Klein Marie, Baues Christian
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Klinikum Mitte, Department of Radiation Oncology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s00066-025-02442-8.
The increasing importance of radiation oncology (RO) education worldwide drives a need for modernization of university curricula, particularly in anticipation of the new Licensing Regulation for Physicians (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) in Germany. This study evaluates RO education at four German medical schools and compares student perspectives with the recommendations of the academic radiation oncology consortium of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) in order to highlight gaps and opportunities for curriculum improvement.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical students from the universities in Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf (ABCD) from January to June 2022. The standardized digital questionnaire included 31 questions (Likert scale and open-ended items) assessing teaching quality, learning formats, and practical relevance. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed.
A total of 152 fully completed surveys were analyzed. Most students (76%) reported the use of clinical case examples, but only 13% had direct patient contact. Small-group teaching and hybrid learning formats were preferred. ABCD students emphasized the need for clearer learning objectives and improved differentiation of RO from related disciplines. While 50% supported increased semester hours, opinions were divided. Findings were largely consistent with DEGRO's recommendations, though discrepancies were observed in the organization of RO within medical curricula.
This study identified key areas for improving RO education, including clearer learning objectives, more interactive and clinically relevant teaching, and increased opportunities for hands-on experience. Integrating these student-informed recommendations into future curriculum reforms may enhance training quality, promote engagement, and support interest in RO as a career.
放射肿瘤学(RO)教育在全球范围内的重要性日益增加,这推动了大学课程现代化的需求,尤其是考虑到德国新的《医师许可条例》(Ärztliche Approbationsordnung,ÄApprO)。本研究评估了德国四所医学院校的RO教育,并将学生的观点与德国放射肿瘤学会(Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie,DEGRO)学术放射肿瘤学联盟的建议进行比较,以突出课程改进的差距和机会。
2022年1月至6月,对亚琛、波恩、科隆和杜塞尔多夫(ABCD)大学的医学生进行了横断面调查。标准化的数字问卷包括31个问题(李克特量表和开放式问题),评估教学质量、学习形式和实际相关性。进行了描述性和主题分析。
共分析了152份完整的调查问卷。大多数学生(76%)报告使用了临床案例,但只有13%有直接的患者接触。小组教学和混合学习形式更受青睐。ABCD的学生强调需要更明确的学习目标,并改善RO与相关学科的区分。虽然50%的学生支持增加学期学时,但意见不一。研究结果在很大程度上与DEGRO的建议一致,不过在医学课程中RO的组织方面存在差异。
本研究确定了改善RO教育的关键领域,包括更明确的学习目标、更具互动性和临床相关性的教学,以及增加实践经验的机会。将这些学生反馈的建议纳入未来的课程改革中,可能会提高培训质量,促进参与度,并支持对RO作为职业的兴趣。