• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗肿瘤患者截肢后疼痛的再生周围神经接口(RPNI)

Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) for the Management of Postamputation Pain in Oncology Patients.

作者信息

Berberoglu Ipek, Kemp Stephen W P, Hooper Rachel C

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48103.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012312.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000012312
PMID:40690370
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Challenges in chronic pain management among post-amputation oncology patients have led to a shift in treatment paradigms. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) has shown promise in attenuating neuropathic pain following traumatic major limb amputations. This study evaluates the utility of prophylactic RPNI among oncology patients requiring major upper and lower extremity amputation. The primary outcome is to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic RPNI in preventing symptomatic neuromas among oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for patients with bone and soft tissue tumors who underwent major limb amputation at a single academic institution between 2010-2023. Patients who underwent prophylactic RPNI (N=27) were compared with a control group (N=35). Outcomes included preoperative pain, postoperative neuroma formation, phantom limb pain (PLP), and chronic opioid use. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-Squared test with GraphPad Prism 10.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven oncology patients (70.4% male, mean age 49.8 years) underwent amputation with prophylactic RPNI. The mean follow-up was 26.3 months (range: 3-58.5 months). The RPNI group included 9 upper and 18 lower extremity amputations. There were no symptomatic neuromas among the RPNI patients. In contrast, symptomatic neuromas were identified among 28.6% of the controls. At 12 months postoperatively, 91.3% of RPNI patients reported "no" or "mild" PLP compared to 70.8% of controls. Additionally, 90% of RPNI patients discontinued opioids within 6 months, compared to 50% of controls.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic RPNI at the time of major limb amputation for oncology patients is associated with a substantial reduction in pain and opioid use.

摘要

背景

截肢后肿瘤患者慢性疼痛管理面临的挑战导致了治疗模式的转变。再生周围神经接口(RPNI)在减轻创伤性大肢体截肢后的神经性疼痛方面显示出前景。本研究评估预防性RPNI在需要进行上下肢大截肢的肿瘤患者中的效用。主要结局是评估预防性RPNI在预防肿瘤患者出现症状性神经瘤方面的有效性。

方法

对2010年至2023年期间在单一学术机构接受大肢体截肢的骨与软组织肿瘤患者进行回顾性研究。将接受预防性RPNI的患者(N = 27)与对照组(N = 35)进行比较。结局指标包括术前疼痛、术后神经瘤形成、幻肢痛(PLP)和慢性阿片类药物使用情况。使用GraphPad Prism 10进行卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

27例肿瘤患者(70.4%为男性,平均年龄49.8岁)接受了预防性RPNI截肢手术。平均随访时间为26.3个月(范围:3 - 58.5个月)。RPNI组包括9例上肢截肢和18例下肢截肢。RPNI患者中未出现症状性神经瘤。相比之下,对照组中有28.6%出现了症状性神经瘤。术后12个月时,91.3%的RPNI患者报告“无”或“轻度”PLP,而对照组为70.8%。此外,90%的RPNI患者在6个月内停用了阿片类药物,而对照组为50%。

结论

肿瘤患者大肢体截肢时进行预防性RPNI与疼痛和阿片类药物使用的大幅减少相关。

相似文献

1
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) for the Management of Postamputation Pain in Oncology Patients.用于治疗肿瘤患者截肢后疼痛的再生周围神经接口(RPNI)
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012312.
2
Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Surgery in Pediatric Lower Limb Amputation Patients.小儿下肢截肢患者的预防性再生周围神经接口手术
Ann Surg. 2025 Aug 1;282(2):346-351. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006327. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for pain prophylaxis and treatment: A systematic review.靶向肌肉神经再支配和再生周围神经接口用于预防和治疗疼痛:系统评价。
PM R. 2023 Nov;15(11):1457-1465. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12972. Epub 2023 May 28.
4
How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.如何使用骨锚式假肢改善下肢截肢患者的患者选择
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003369.
5
Prevention is better than cure: Surgical methods for neuropathic pain prevention following amputation - A systematic review.预防胜于治疗:预防截肢后神经病理性疼痛的手术方法——系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):948-959. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.076. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
6
Evaluating the Impact of Diabetes and Metformin on Painful Neuromas After Lower Extremity Amputations.评估糖尿病和二甲双胍对下肢截肢后疼痛性神经瘤的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 1;95(2):170-177. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004419. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
7
Intercostal Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for the Prevention of Neuroma-Associated Postbreast Surgery Pain Syndrome in Breast Reconstruction: A Proof-of-Concept Study.用于预防乳房重建术后神经瘤相关疼痛综合征的肋间再生周围神经接口:一项概念验证研究。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025 May 3;7:ojaf037. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf037. eCollection 2025.
8
Non-surgical interventions for preventing contralateral tissue loss and amputation in dysvascular patients with a primary major lower limb amputation.非手术干预措施预防原发性下肢主要截肢后血运不良患者对侧组织损失和截肢
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 28;8(8):CD013857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013857.pub2.
9
What Are the Factors Associated With Revision Surgery on the Residual Limb and Functional Results in Patients With Posttraumatic Lower Limb Amputations?创伤后下肢截肢患者残肢翻修手术及功能结果的相关因素有哪些?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):501-510. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003251. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
10
What Are the Complications, Function, and Survival of Tumor-devitalized Autografts Used in Patients With Limb-sparing Surgery for Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors? A Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group Multi-institutional Study.肿瘤灭活自体移植物用于保肢手术治疗骨和软组织肿瘤患者的并发症、功能和生存情况如何?日本肌肉骨骼肿瘤学组多机构研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2110-2124. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002720. Epub 2023 Jun 14.