Ghorbani Amirhosein, Mousavi Seyyed Abbas, Molavi Hossein
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 14588-89694, Iran.
Department of Chemistry, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Science (IASBS), Zanjan 45137-66731, Iran.
Langmuir. 2025 Aug 5;41(30):19776-19788. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c01627. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
In the current research, two different metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), zirconium (Zr)- and cerium (Ce)-based UiO-66-NH, were synthesized to compare their adsorption capacities for the removal of the pharmaceutical pollutant ofloxacin (OFL). The stability of the adsorbents after adsorption and after adsorption-desorption cycles was examined by conducting XRD, FTIR, FESEM, and BET analyses. The XRD and BET analyses showed that Zr-MOF possessed higher crystallinity and a larger surface area compared to Ce-MOF. However, Ce-MOF exhibited better adsorption capacity than Zr-MOF, which could be attributed to surface defects resulting from the partial reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(III) during the synthesis process, as well as electrostatic attraction under the study conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that OFL adsorption on both adsorbents followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The Langmuir isotherm model accurately corresponded to the experimental adsorption isotherm of both adsorbents, exhibiting the maximum adsorption capacity of 114.94 and 136.99 mg/g for Zr-UiO-66-NH and Ce-UiO-66-NH, respectively. Optimal adsorption occurred with a contact time of 240 min, an adsorbent dosage of 0.25 g/L, and a temperature of 298 K. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed that the adsorption process of both nanoparticles is spontaneous, and Zr-UiO-66-NH MOFs exhibited endothermic behavior, while Ce-UiO-66-NH MOFs showed exothermic nature. Additionally, the reusability test demonstrated that both adsorbents still have excellent adsorption performance after four cycles.
在当前的研究中,合成了两种不同的金属有机框架材料(MOF),即锆(Zr)基和铈(Ce)基的UiO-66-NH,以比较它们对药物污染物氧氟沙星(OFL)的吸附能力。通过进行XRD、FTIR、FESEM和BET分析,研究了吸附剂在吸附后以及吸附-解吸循环后的稳定性。XRD和BET分析表明,与Ce-MOF相比,Zr-MOF具有更高的结晶度和更大的表面积。然而,Ce-MOF表现出比Zr-MOF更好的吸附能力,这可能归因于合成过程中Ce(IV)部分还原为Ce(III)导致的表面缺陷,以及研究条件下的静电吸引。实验结果表明,两种吸附剂对OFL的吸附均遵循准二级动力学模型。Langmuir等温线模型与两种吸附剂的实验吸附等温线精确对应,Zr-UiO-66-NH和Ce-UiO-66-NH的最大吸附容量分别为114.94和136.99 mg/g。在接触时间为240分钟、吸附剂用量为0.25 g/L和温度为298 K的条件下发生最佳吸附。热力学分析证实,两种纳米颗粒的吸附过程都是自发的,Zr-UiO-66-NH MOF表现出吸热行为,而Ce-UiO-66-NH MOF表现出放热性质。此外,可重复使用性测试表明,两种吸附剂在四个循环后仍具有优异的吸附性能。