Lima E Silva Thales Daniel Oliveira de, Matias Andrezza Cavalcante Nunes, Jacob de Menezes Neto Elias, Valsecchi do Amaral João, da Silva Lorena Ianka Pontes, Medeiros Jacob Michelle Cristine, da Silva-Maia Juliana Kelly, Tregidgo Daniel
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development, Tefé, Amazonas, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0327783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327783. eCollection 2025.
The Amazon region, renowned for its rich biodiversity, is home to indigenous and riverside populations that maintain an intrinsic relationship with the forest, playing a crucial role in the local ecological balance. The diet of this population, based on fish and wild meat, is essential for their food security, providing proteins and other fundamental nutrients. However, the nutritional composition of these meats remains under-researched, limiting the development of appropriate nutritional strategies and interventions. This study aimed to characterize the proximate composition of mammal, bird, and reptile wild meat consumed within the context of a traditional food system in the Brazilian Amazon. A total of 78 samples were collected, including 51 mammals, 18 birds, and 9 reptile samples, from the Tefé National Forest, and the Amanã and Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserves. The muscle tissues of the samples were analyzed following the official methods of the Association of Official Analytical Collaboration. Differences between taxonomic classes were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test with Bonferroni adjustment (P < 0.05) for those species with three or more replicates. Across all samples, descriptive statistics showed that the mean protein contents were 22.27 (1,32), 23.47 (1.7), and 22.31 (1.3) g/100 g of meat for mammals, birds, and reptiles, respectively. The mean ash contents were 1.08 (0.11), 1.27 (0.1), and 1.08 (0.13) g/100 g of meat, while the lipid contents were 5.72 (1,72), 5.40 (1.58), and 4.03 (0.53) g/100 g of meat for the same groups. Additionally, results indicated that macronutrient and ash (p = 0.13) levels did not differ significantly among classes: lipids (p = 0.07164) and proteins (p = 0.3055). When comparing the meats of wild mammals, birds, and reptiles with domestic meats typically consumed in modern food systems, a nutritional similarity was observed, highlighting their importance as key nutrient sources, particularly proteins. The data obtained provide a foundation for further research and will serve as a basis for strategies aimed at promoting food and nutritional security, contributing to the reduction of maternal and child malnutrition in Amazonian communities. Furthermore, the novel quantification of the proximate composition of wild meats underscores their role as a strategic resource for promoting health in these populations.
亚马逊地区以其丰富的生物多样性而闻名,是与森林保持着内在联系的原住民和河边居民的家园,他们在当地生态平衡中发挥着关键作用。该人群以鱼类和野味为基础的饮食对其粮食安全至关重要,提供蛋白质和其他基本营养素。然而,这些肉类的营养成分仍研究不足,限制了适当营养策略和干预措施的发展。本研究旨在描述巴西亚马逊地区传统食物系统中食用的哺乳动物、鸟类和爬行动物野味的近似成分。从特费国家森林以及阿曼ã和马米拉瓦可持续发展保护区共采集了78个样本,包括51个哺乳动物样本、18个鸟类样本和9个爬行动物样本。按照官方分析协作协会的官方方法对样本的肌肉组织进行了分析。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验评估分类类之间的差异,对于有三个或更多重复样本的物种,随后进行Dunn检验并进行Bonferroni校正(P < 0.05)。在所有样本中,描述性统计显示,哺乳动物、鸟类和爬行动物每100克肉的平均蛋白质含量分别为22.27(1.32)、23.47(1.7)和22.31(1.3)克。平均灰分含量分别为1.08(0.11)、1.27(0.1)和1.08(0.13)克/100克肉,而相同组别的脂质含量分别为5.72(1.72)、5.40(1.58)和4.03(0.53)克/100克肉。此外,结果表明,不同类别之间的常量营养素和灰分(p = 0.13)水平没有显著差异:脂质(p = 0.07164)和蛋白质(p = 0.3055)。当将野生哺乳动物、鸟类和爬行动物的肉与现代食物系统中通常食用的家养肉类进行比较时,观察到营养相似性,突出了它们作为关键营养来源,特别是蛋白质来源的重要性。获得的数据为进一步研究提供了基础,并将作为旨在促进粮食和营养安全、有助于减少亚马逊社区母婴营养不良的策略的基础。此外,对野生动物肉近似成分的新量化强调了它们作为促进这些人群健康的战略资源的作用。