Goothy Sai Sailesh Kumar, Singh Rohit, Reel Joseph, Robinson Rachel, Ratajczak Wiktoria, Watson Sinead, McKeown Jason
Indian Center of Neurophysiology, Andhra Pradesh, India; NRI Institute of Medical Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India.
NRI Institute of Medical Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Dec 15;391:119949. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119949. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
Stimulating the vestibular nerve may influence neurological processes such as prefrontal cortex functions, aiding cognitive flexibility and emotional regulation, important aspects of addressing depressive patterns. This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a non-invasive electrical vestibular nerve stimulation (VeNS) device as a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD).
62 adults (mean age = 43.1 ± 5.0 years) with MDD were randomized to receive an active VeNS device (n = 31) or a sham device (n = 31). Both groups attended the clinic for stimulation sessions (30 min) 5 days per week. The primary outcome was change in Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score from baseline to week 8. Secondary outcomes were change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Generalized Anxiety Disorder, 7-item (GAD-7), and the EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index (HUI) scores from baseline to week 8. A post-intervention follow-up was at week 12.
After 8 weeks, the active group showed a mean BDI-II score reduction of 6.39 points greater than the sham group (P < 0.001), with scores remaining low during the 4-week post-intervention follow-up. Additionally, the active group, compared with the sham group, showed a significant improvement in ISI (-6.29 vs. 2.23, p < 0.001), GAD-7 (-4.45 vs. -0.32, p < 0.001) and HUI (0.51 vs 0.11, p < 0.001) One minor Adverse Event was reported in the sham group. Formal blinding assessment demonstrated a successful level of blinding was achieved throughout the study.
VeNS, when delivered over 8-weeks, appears to have a clinically meaningful benefit as an intervention for major depressive disorder.
刺激前庭神经可能会影响神经过程,如前额叶皮层功能,有助于认知灵活性和情绪调节,这是解决抑郁模式的重要方面。这项随机、双盲、假对照试验旨在确定一种非侵入性电前庭神经刺激(VeNS)设备治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的疗效和安全性。
62名患有重度抑郁症的成年人(平均年龄=43.1±5.0岁)被随机分为接受有源VeNS设备组(n=31)或假设备组(n=31)。两组均每周5天到诊所进行刺激治疗(30分钟)。主要结局是从基线到第8周贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)评分的变化。次要结局是从基线到第8周失眠严重程度指数(ISI)、广泛性焦虑障碍7项量表(GAD-7)和EQ-5D-5L健康效用指数(HUI)评分的变化。干预后随访在第12周进行。
8周后,有源组的BDI-II平均评分降低幅度比假手术组大6.39分(P<0.001),在干预后4周的随访期间评分一直较低。此外,与假手术组相比,有源组在ISI(-6.29对2.23,p<0.001)、GAD-7(-4.45对-0.32,p<0.001)和HUI(0.51对0.11,p<0.001)方面有显著改善。假手术组报告了1例轻微不良事件。正式的盲法评估表明,整个研究达到了成功的盲法水平。
8周的VeNS治疗似乎对重度抑郁症具有临床意义的益处。