van Schalkwyk May Ci, Cassidy Rebecca
Global Health Policy Unit School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, United Kingdom.
Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom.
Future Healthc J. 2025 Jun 30;12(2):100267. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2025.100267. eCollection 2025 Jun.
This article explains how gambling policy in the UK perpetuates exceptionalism by, among other things, promoting a way of understanding the drivers of gambling harm that is highly favourable to the interests of the industry and its political allies. It argues that this exceptionalism should come to an end, that completely transformative ways of thinking about this industry are possible, and considers what that would mean for gambling legislation and research. This is achieved by taking the reader on a reflective journey that involves stepping back and critiquing the taken for granted by posing a set of thought-provoking rhetorical questions. In order to support the case against exceptionalism, the article makes illuminating comparisons between gambling and other industries.
本文解释了英国的赌博政策是如何延续例外主义的,其中包括推广一种理解赌博危害驱动因素的方式,这种方式非常有利于该行业及其政治盟友的利益。文章认为这种例外主义应该结束,对这个行业进行彻底变革性思考是可行的,并探讨了这对赌博立法和研究意味着什么。这是通过带领读者踏上一段反思之旅来实现的,该旅程包括退后一步,通过提出一系列发人深省的修辞性问题来批判那些被视为理所当然的事物。为了支持反对例外主义的观点,本文对赌博业和其他行业进行了有启发性的比较。