Ariestine Dina Aprillia, Darmadi Darmadi
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Acta Med Acad. 2025 Apr;54(1):27-35. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.473.
This study aimed to thoroughly assess and evaluate recent studies comparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection in older patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
We searched the databases PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane for articles published up to 31 October 2024. This review included studies comparing RFA and surgical resection in individuals with HCC aged 65 years or older. The exclusion criteria were non-human research, case reports, editorials, and studies involving patients with liver metastases or cholangiocarcinoma.
We found four retrospective cohort studies. The derived data showed no difference in one-year survival rates. However, the RFA group exhibited a better disease-free survival rate and a lower mortality rate than the surgical resection group.
RFA outperformed surgical resection in terms of overall and disease-free survival rates while showing no appreciable variation in the occurrence of complications. However, this study underscores the need for more extensive research utilizing larger sample sizes, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
本研究旨在全面评估和评价近期比较老年肝细胞癌(HCC)患者射频消融(RFA)与手术切除的研究。
我们在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库中检索截至2024年10月31日发表的文章。本综述纳入了比较65岁及以上HCC患者RFA与手术切除的研究。排除标准为非人体研究、病例报告、社论以及涉及肝转移或胆管癌患者的研究。
我们发现了四项回顾性队列研究。得出的数据显示一年生存率无差异。然而,RFA组的无病生存率优于手术切除组,且死亡率低于手术切除组。
在总生存率和无病生存率方面,RFA优于手术切除,同时并发症发生率无明显差异。然而,本研究强调需要利用更大样本量进行更广泛的研究,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。