Wu Zefeng, Sun Yali, Yang Jun, Liu Zigang, Niu Yining, Zhang Xiaowei
State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China.
National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China.
Plant Cell Physiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaf082.
Although the evolutionarily younger nitrogen-fixing symbioses (NFS) occurring between plants and rhizobia are predominantly confined to legume species, they exhibit a series of highly conserved characteristics in common with the more ancestral arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis (AMS). A growing number of symbiosis-regulated genes have been characterized through either genetic analysis or phylogenomic profiling. However, the underlying similarities and specificities of the transcription regulatory machinery in AMS and NFS remain largely unclarified. Here, we systematically profiled the gene expression changes in three legume species, namely Medicago truncatula, Glycine max, and Lotus japonicus, during AMS and NFS. Additionally, we investigated gene expression changes in three non-legume plants, Solanum lycopersicum, Zea mays, and Oryza sativa, during AMS. We identified thousands of genes that were activated by AMS or NFS in their respective host plants. Through comparative genomics analysis, we systematically explored the conservation and specificity of genes responsive to AMS or NFS. Employing M. truncatula and G. max as illustrative cases, we harnessed the XGboost machine-learning model to construct co-expression-based gene regulatory networks for AMS and NFS within these two species. Through this approach, we successfully illuminated the similarities and unique features of the two symbiotic types at the gene regulatory network level. Further, utilizing known symbiosis genes as queries, we pinpointed a multitude of genes that are intimately associated with AMS and NFS. Overall, via in-depth gene expression profiling and regulatory network analysis, our results indicate that, while NFS in legumes has regulatory circuits similar to those of AMS, there exist certain symbiosis type-specific molecular components.
尽管植物与根瘤菌之间进化上较年轻的固氮共生关系(NFS)主要局限于豆科植物物种,但它们与更古老的丛枝菌根共生关系(AMS)具有一系列高度保守的特征。通过遗传分析或系统发育基因组分析,越来越多的共生调节基因已被表征。然而,AMS和NFS中转录调控机制的潜在相似性和特异性在很大程度上仍未明确。在这里,我们系统地分析了三种豆科植物,即蒺藜苜蓿、大豆和百脉根,在AMS和NFS过程中的基因表达变化。此外,我们还研究了三种非豆科植物,即番茄、玉米和水稻,在AMS过程中的基因表达变化。我们在各自的宿主植物中鉴定出了数千个被AMS或NFS激活的基因。通过比较基因组学分析,我们系统地探索了对AMS或NFS有反应的基因的保守性和特异性。以蒺藜苜蓿和大豆为例,我们利用XGboost机器学习模型构建了这两个物种中基于共表达的AMS和NFS基因调控网络。通过这种方法,我们成功地在基因调控网络水平上阐明了这两种共生类型的相似性和独特特征。此外,利用已知的共生基因作为查询,我们确定了许多与AMS和NFS密切相关的基因。总体而言,通过深入的基因表达谱分析和调控网络分析,我们的结果表明,虽然豆科植物中的NFS具有与AMS相似的调控回路,但存在某些共生类型特异性的分子成分。