Suppr超能文献

家长与医护人员对危重症通气儿童短期预后的看法。

Parent and Provider Perspectives on Short-Term Outcomes of Critically Ill Ventilated Children.

作者信息

Shannon Megan M, Keim Garrett, Harhay Michael O, Yehya Nadir

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003794.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As mortality is rare in pediatrics, alternative composite outcomes such as ventilator-free days (VFDs), PICU-free days, or hospital-free days, are often used in pediatric critical care research. However, it is unclear which of these nonmortality components of composite outcomes are prioritized by families, and thus reflect true patient-centered outcomes. We therefore aimed to determine and compare families' and PICU providers' priorities regarding outcomes for ventilated patients in the PICU. We hypothesized that families and providers would prioritize different nonmortality outcomes.

DESIGN

This is a single-center, prospective cross-sectional survey of immediate caregivers of children experiencing both invasive and noninvasive ventilation and asynchronously of PICU attending providers. Subjects were asked to rank, in order of priority, five nonmortality outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of invasive and noninvasive ventilation, duration of any oxygen support, PICU length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS.

SETTING

Quaternary, academic PICU in urban setting.

SUBJECTS

We surveyed 50 adult caregivers and 30 PICU faculty.

INTERVENTIONS

Survey administration at a single timepoint.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

While both families (kappa = 0.11) and providers (kappa = 0.15) demonstrated poor overall intra-group agreement of rankings, most families and providers ranked duration of invasive ventilation highest, and duration of invasive and noninvasive ventilation second highest. However, families ranked their subsequent priorities (in order) as the duration of all oxygen support, PICU LOS, and then hospital LOS. In contrast, providers ranked PICU LOS, then hospital LOS, and lastly, duration of all oxygen support.

CONCLUSIONS

In a study that directly assessed family and provider preferences of nonmortality outcomes, we found that duration of invasive ventilation is indeed a patient- and family-centered outcome measure, while LOS is less prioritized in intubated PICU patients. This suggests that composites based on ventilator duration, such as VFDs, are indeed patient-centered.

摘要

目的

由于儿科死亡率较低,儿科重症监护研究中常使用其他综合结局指标,如无呼吸机天数(VFDs)、无儿科重症监护病房(PICU)天数或无住院天数。然而,尚不清楚这些综合结局指标中的非死亡组成部分哪些是家庭优先考虑的,从而反映真正以患者为中心的结局。因此,我们旨在确定并比较家庭和PICU医护人员对PICU中接受通气治疗患者结局的优先排序。我们假设家庭和医护人员会优先考虑不同的非死亡结局。

设计

这是一项针对经历有创和无创通气的儿童的直接照料者以及PICU主治医护人员的单中心前瞻性横断面调查。受试者被要求按优先顺序对五个非死亡结局进行排序:有创通气持续时间、有创和无创通气持续时间、任何氧疗支持持续时间、PICU住院时长(LOS)以及医院住院时长。

地点

城市环境中的四级学术性PICU。

受试者

我们调查了50名成年照料者和30名PICU医护人员。

干预措施

在单个时间点进行问卷调查。

测量指标及主要结果

虽然家庭(kappa = 0.11)和医护人员(kappa = 0.15)在组内排序的总体一致性都较差,但大多数家庭和医护人员将有创通气持续时间排在最高位,将有创和无创通气持续时间排在第二位。然而,家庭随后的优先排序(依次)是所有氧疗支持持续时间、PICU住院时长,然后是医院住院时长。相比之下,医护人员将PICU住院时长排在首位,然后是医院住院时长,最后是所有氧疗支持持续时间。

结论

在一项直接评估家庭和医护人员对非死亡结局偏好的研究中,我们发现有创通气持续时间确实是以患者和家庭为中心的结局指标,而在接受气管插管的PICU患者中,住院时长的优先级较低。这表明基于通气持续时间的综合指标,如VFDs,确实是以患者为中心的。

相似文献

1
Parent and Provider Perspectives on Short-Term Outcomes of Critically Ill Ventilated Children.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003794.
3
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 25;10(10):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub3.
4
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 13(8):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub2.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
6
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 20;11(11):CD015532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015532.
7
Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 8;1(1):CD010225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010225.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of intensive care unit-free and ventilator-free days as alternative outcomes in the pragmatic airway resuscitation trial.
Resuscitation. 2022 Oct;179:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.07.042. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Patient prioritization of routine and patient-reported postoperative outcome measures: a prospective, nested cross-sectional study.
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;69(6):693-703. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02191-7. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
Hospital-Free Days: A Pragmatic and Patient-centered Outcome for Trials among Critically and Seriously Ill Patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 15;204(8):902-909. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202104-1063PP.
4
Priority Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Patient and Parent Perspective.
Am J Crit Care. 2020 Sep 1;29(5):e94-e103. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2020188.
5
Important Outcomes for Parents of Critically Ill Children.
Crit Care Nurse. 2019 Jun;39(3):74-79. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019482.
6
Reappraisal of Ventilator-Free Days in Critical Care Research.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):828-836. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-2050CP.
8
Tight Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Children.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 23;376(8):729-741. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612348. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
9
Relevant Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Studies.
Front Pediatr. 2016 May 13;4:51. doi: 10.3389/fped.2016.00051. eCollection 2016.
10
Patient-centred healthcare outcome measures: towards a unified architecture.
J R Soc Med. 2014 Aug;107(8):300-302. doi: 10.1177/0141076814545701. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验