Zhang Maoquan, Deng Hanqing, Hu Rihua, Chen Fuwei, Dong Shiwen, Zhang Shiyi, Guo Wenyan, Yang Wen, Chen Wenxin
Department of Breast Surgery, Sanming First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, 29 Liedong Road, Sanming, 365001, Fujian, China.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 23;15(1):26717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12883-x.
Distant metastasis remains the leading cause of mortality in breast cancer, yet comprehensive population-based evaluations of metastatic site combinations and their survival implications are limited. This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological determinants and prognostic outcomes of site-specific and multi-organ metastases in breast cancer using SEER data. A total of 200,558 female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2023 were extracted from the SEER database. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between clinicopathological features and metastatic patterns. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to evaluate overall survival (OS) across different metastatic site combinations. Among patients with distant metastasis classified into 15 common metastatic patterns, bone was the most common metastatic site (21.3%), followed by lung (16.1%), liver (9.2%), and brain (2.9%). Molecular subtypes showed distinct organotropism: HR+/HER2 - tumors were prone to bone-only metastasis, whereas HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes were more likely to involve visceral and brain metastases. Multi-organ metastases, especially combinations including the brain (e.g., brain + liver + lung), were associated with the poorest prognosis (median OS: 4.0 months). Younger age (≤ 40 years), higher histological grade (Grade III), and tumor location in the axillary tail or unspecified regions were independently associated with increased metastatic risk. Grade III tumors exhibited broader visceral spread and significantly worse survival compared to lower-grade tumors. This is the first population-based study to systematically characterize 15 metastatic site combinations and their survival outcomes across molecular subtypes. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of breast cancer metastasis and underscore the need for subtype-specific, site-targeted surveillance strategies and prognostic assessment tools.
远处转移仍然是乳腺癌死亡的主要原因,但基于人群的转移性部位组合及其生存影响的综合评估有限。本研究旨在利用监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据,探讨乳腺癌特定部位和多器官转移的临床病理决定因素及预后结果。从SEER数据库中提取了200558例在2014年至2023年期间确诊的女性乳腺癌患者。采用逻辑回归分析评估临床病理特征与转移模式之间的关联。应用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型评估不同转移部位组合的总生存期(OS)。在远处转移患者中,分为15种常见转移模式,骨是最常见的转移部位(21.3%),其次是肺(16.1%)、肝(9.2%)和脑(2.9%)。分子亚型表现出不同的器官嗜性:HR+/HER2-肿瘤易发生仅骨转移,而HER2阳性和三阴性亚型更易发生内脏和脑转移。多器官转移,尤其是包括脑的组合(如脑+肝+肺),与最差的预后相关(中位OS:4.0个月)。较年轻年龄(≤40岁)、较高组织学分级(III级)以及肿瘤位于腋窝尾部或未指定区域与转移风险增加独立相关。与低级别肿瘤相比,III级肿瘤表现出更广泛的内脏扩散且生存明显更差。这是第一项基于人群的研究,系统地描述了15种转移部位组合及其在分子亚型中的生存结果。研究结果突出了乳腺癌转移的异质性,并强调了针对亚型、靶向部位的监测策略和预后评估工具的必要性。