Mannion Melissa L, Aswani Monica S, Hearld K Ria, Smitherman Emily A, Timmerman Livie, Curtis Jeffrey R
University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1600 7th Ave S, CPPN G10, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2025 Jul 22;23(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12969-025-01130-2.
To account for the chronic time course of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), we assessed medication changes by disease activity patterns across 2 sequential timepoints.
Patients with non-systemic JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry with complete clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Scores (cJADAS) at 6 and 12-month registry visits were included. Disease activity was classified by cJADAS categories (inactive/minimal, moderate/high). The primary outcome was disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) escalation at the 12-month visit. We examined the association between cJADAS patterns and DMARD escalation.
The cJADAS patterns across paired visits for 2,956 patients with JIA were: 71% persistent inactive/minimal, 25% persistent moderate/high, 2% "improving", and 2% "flaring". Only 10% of patients had DMARD escalation at the 12-month visit, including only 15% of patients with persistent moderate/high disease activity. In multivariable logistic regression adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables, DMARD escalation at the 12-month visit was associated with "flaring" disease activity (odds ratio [OR] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-5.18), DMARD escalation between the 6- and 12-month visits (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.40-2.49) and morning stiffness (> 60 min 4.98, 95% CI 3.00-8.27), while age 15-19 years were less likely to escalate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.97).
In a large multicenter registry of US patients with JIA, DMARD escalation at the 12-month visit was uncommon overall, even for those with persistent moderate/high disease activity. Our findings suggest that DMARD escalation in this cohort did not align well with a treat to target approach using cJADAS thresholds.
为解释青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)的慢性病程,我们通过两个连续时间点的疾病活动模式评估了药物变化。
纳入在儿童关节炎和风湿病研究联盟注册中心登记的非系统性JIA患者,这些患者在登记访视的6个月和12个月时具有完整的青少年关节炎疾病活动评分(cJADAS)。疾病活动根据cJADAS类别(无活动/最低、中度/高度)进行分类。主要结局是在12个月访视时改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)的升级。我们研究了cJADAS模式与DMARD升级之间的关联。
2956例JIA患者配对访视的cJADAS模式为:71%持续无活动/最低,25%持续中度/高度,2%“改善”,2%“复发”。仅10%的患者在12个月访视时有DMARD升级,其中仅15%的患者有持续中度/高度疾病活动。在对社会人口统计学和临床变量进行调整的多变量逻辑回归分析中,12个月访视时的DMARD升级与“复发”疾病活动相关(比值比[OR]2.62,95%置信区间[CI]1.33 - 5.18)、6至12个月访视期间的DMARD升级(OR 1.86,95% CI 1.40 - 2.49)以及晨僵(>60分钟 4.98,95% CI 3.00 - 8.27)相关,而15至19岁的患者升级可能性较小(OR 0.61,95% CI 0.38 - 0.97)。
在美国一个大型多中心JIA患者注册中心,总体而言,12个月访视时DMARD升级并不常见,即使对于那些有持续中度/高度疾病活动的患者也是如此。我们的研究结果表明,该队列中的DMARD升级与使用cJADAS阈值的达标治疗方法不太一致。