McCready Taylor M, Nandi Shinjini, Qian Yingzhi, Wen Shawn, Kwon Simona C, Zauber Ann G, Dominitz Jason A, Sherman Scott E, Liang Peter S
Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43593. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043593.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has been reported to be higher than the US general population, but CRC remains a prevalent cancer within the VA system. To examine CRC predictors and the extent to which the conventional definition of up-to-date screening applies to the population, we conducted a case-control study using VA data from 2012 to 2018. We classified patients into 5 categories: up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged 50 to 75 (Categories 1 and 2), up-to-date or not up-to-date average-risk patients aged <50 or >75 (Categories 3 and 4), and high-risk patients (Category 5). Each CRC case was matched by age, sex, and facility with 4 controls. We performed multivariable conditional logistic regression, adjusting for race and ethnicity, diabetes, obesity, and alcohol use. Among 3714 CRC cases identified, Category 4 (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.11-1.78) and Category 5 (OR 6.23, 95% CI 5.06-7.66) patients had a higher risk of CRC compared to Category 1 patients. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a higher risk (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.37-1.73). Diabetes (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.51-1.81) and alcohol use disorder (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.35-1.73) were also associated with CRC. Most CRC cases occurred in individuals aged 50 to 75, but 12.5% occurred in persons who were outside of this age range or had high-risk personal or family history. The conventional measure of CRC screening, focused on average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75, does not reflect screening status in an important minority of CRC patients.
据报道,退伍军人健康管理局(VA)的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查接受率高于美国普通人群,但CRC在VA系统内仍然是一种常见癌症。为了研究CRC的预测因素以及最新筛查的传统定义适用于该人群的程度,我们使用2012年至2018年的VA数据进行了一项病例对照研究。我们将患者分为5类:50至75岁的最新或未最新的平均风险患者(第1和第2类)、年龄小于50岁或大于75岁的最新或未最新的平均风险患者(第3和第4类)以及高风险患者(第5类)。每个CRC病例按年龄、性别和机构与4名对照进行匹配。我们进行了多变量条件逻辑回归分析,对种族和族裔、糖尿病、肥胖和饮酒情况进行了调整。在3714例确诊的CRC病例中,与第1类患者相比,第4类患者(优势比[OR]为1.40,95%置信区间为1.11-1.78)和第5类患者(OR为6.23,95%置信区间为5.06-7.66)患CRC的风险更高。与白人患者相比,黑人患者的风险更高(OR为1.54,95%置信区间为1.37-1.73)。糖尿病(OR为1.65,95%置信区间为1.51-1.81)和酒精使用障碍(OR为1.53,95%置信区间为1.35-1.73)也与CRC有关。大多数CRC病例发生在50至75岁的个体中,但12.5%发生在该年龄范围之外或有高风险个人或家族史的人群中。以50至75岁的平均风险个体为重点的CRC筛查传统指标,并不能反映相当一部分CRC患者的筛查状况。