• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。

Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693
PMID:39585696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11589799/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is effective but remains underused in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a centralized CRC screening outreach intervention involving mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach and patient navigation to colonoscopy after abnormal results of FIT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted, using intention-to-treat analysis. Participants were enrolled from July 6, 2020, to September 17, 2021, and analyses were performed from July 6, 2023, to January 31, 2024. The study was conducted at independent FQHCs comprising 12 clinical delivery sites in North Carolina. The outreach intervention was centralized at an academic cancer center. Active individuals aged 50 to 75 years at average risk for CRC and not current with screening per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations were included.

INTERVENTION

In addition to usual care, intervention participants received mailed screening outreach materials including an introductory letter, FIT kit packet with instructions and return postage, and 2 reminder letters if needed. Intervention participants with positive results of mailed FIT were offered navigation to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy completion. Control participants received usual care alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was completion of a US Preventive Services Task Force-recommended CRC screening test within 6 months determined by electronic health record review. Secondary outcomes were colonoscopy completion within 6 months after positive FIT results and detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as advanced adenoma or CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 4002 participants were included (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [6.8] years; 2256 [56.4%] female; 364 (9.1%) Hispanic; 1082 [27.0%] non-Hispanic Black; 2288 [57.2%] non-Hispanic White; 1198 [29.9%] commercially insured; 617 [15.4%] Medicaid; 1227 [30.7%] Medicare; and 960 [24.0%] uninsured), with 2001 randomized to each group. Compared with controls, intervention participants were more likely to complete screening within 6 months of randomization (30.0% vs 9.7%; difference, 20.29 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.85-22.73 percentage points). The intervention was effective in all insurance types. In the intervention arm, 33 of 48 participants with positive FIT results (68.8%) completed follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months compared with 8 of 18 participants (44.4%) in the control arm (difference, 24.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.13 to 50.74 percentage points). Advanced colorectal neoplasia was detected in 29 intervention participants (1.4%) and 15 control participants (0.7%) (difference, 0.68 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.05-1.35 percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial of centralized screening outreach intervention in diverse patients served by independent FQHCs, CRC screening completion and advanced colorectal neoplasia detection were substantially increased. Future studies should examine the cost and scalability of this intervention in this context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04406714.

摘要

重要性

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查是有效的,但在合格的联邦健康中心(FQHC)中仍未得到充分利用。

目的

评估涉及邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)外展和 FIT 结果异常后对结肠镜检查的患者导航的集中 CRC 筛查外展干预的有效性。

设计、设置和参与者:进行了一项实用随机临床试验,采用意向治疗分析。参与者于 2020 年 7 月 6 日至 2021 年 9 月 17 日入组,分析于 2023 年 7 月 6 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日进行。该研究在北卡罗来纳州的 12 个临床服务站点组成的独立 FQHC 中进行。外展干预集中在一家学术癌症中心。纳入年龄在 50 至 75 岁之间、平均 CRC 风险且不符合美国预防服务工作组建议的常规筛查的活跃个体。

干预措施

除常规护理外,干预组参与者还接受了邮寄筛查外展材料,包括介绍信、带有说明和回邮邮资的 FIT 试剂盒包以及如果需要的 2 封提醒信。邮寄 FIT 阳性结果的干预组参与者获得了导航服务,以促进后续结肠镜检查的完成。对照组仅接受常规护理。

主要结果和措施

主要结局是通过电子健康记录审查确定的在 6 个月内完成美国预防服务工作组推荐的 CRC 筛查测试。次要结局是在阳性 FIT 结果后 6 个月内完成结肠镜检查和检测高级结直肠肿瘤,定义为高级腺瘤或 CRC。

结果

共纳入 4002 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄 59.6[6.8]岁;2256[56.4%]名女性;364[9.1%]名西班牙裔;1082[27.0%]名非西班牙裔黑人;2288[57.2%]名非西班牙裔白人;1198[29.9%]名商业保险;617[15.4%]名医疗补助;1227[30.7%]名医疗保险;960[24.0%]名无保险),随机分为两组,每组 2001 名。与对照组相比,干预组在随机分组后 6 个月内完成筛查的可能性更高(30.0% vs 9.7%;差异,20.29 个百分点;95%CI,17.85-22.73 个百分点)。该干预措施在所有保险类型中均有效。在干预组中,48 名阳性 FIT 结果患者中有 33 名(68.8%)在 6 个月内完成了后续结肠镜检查,而对照组中有 18 名患者中的 8 名(44.4%)(差异,24.3 个百分点;95%CI,-2.13 至 50.74 个百分点)。在 29 名干预参与者(1.4%)和 15 名对照组参与者(0.7%)中检测到高级结直肠肿瘤(差异,0.68 个百分点;95%CI,0.05-1.35 个百分点)。

结论和相关性

在这项针对由独立 FQHC 服务的不同患者的集中筛查外展干预的随机临床试验中,CRC 筛查完成率和高级结直肠肿瘤检出率均有显著提高。未来的研究应在该背景下评估该干预措施的成本和可扩展性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04406714。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee1/11589799/9fdd8055f239/jamanetwopen-e2446693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee1/11589799/325d3a6947c5/jamanetwopen-e2446693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee1/11589799/9fdd8055f239/jamanetwopen-e2446693-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee1/11589799/325d3a6947c5/jamanetwopen-e2446693-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fee1/11589799/9fdd8055f239/jamanetwopen-e2446693-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Centralized Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.在联邦合格健康中心开展集中结直肠癌筛查外展活动:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46693.
2
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
3
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
4
Clinical Validation of a Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Blood Test to Screen for Colorectal Cancer.一种基于循环肿瘤DNA的血液检测用于筛查结直肠癌的临床验证
JAMA. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.7515.
5
Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.结直肠癌的化学预防:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jun;14(32):1-206. doi: 10.3310/hta14320.
6
Improving animated instructional videos for colorectal cancer screening: An application of learner verification and revision.改进结直肠癌筛查的动画教学视频:学习者验证与修订的应用
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf020.
7
Automatic Quality Control System and Adenoma Detection Rates During Routine Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.常规结肠镜检查期间的自动质量控制系统与腺瘤检出率:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2457241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57241.
8
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
9
High-Touch vs Low-Touch Strategy for Implementing a CRC Screening Digital Health Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.实施结直肠癌筛查数字健康干预的高接触与低接触策略:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0779.
10
Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.膳食纤维用于预防复发性结直肠腺瘤和癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 8;1(1):CD003430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003430.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a digital health platform to implement a multi-component CRC screening intervention within a federally qualified health center: study protocol for a hybrid type I trial.在联邦合格健康中心内使用数字健康平台实施多组分结直肠癌筛查干预:一项混合型 I 期试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 8;25(1):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13262-y.
2
Effectiveness of a community health advisor colorectal cancer screening educational intervention on stool test completion in an African American primary care patient population: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.社区健康顾问结直肠癌筛查教育干预对非裔美国初级保健患者群体粪便检测完成情况的有效性:一项实用随机对照试验
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;3(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00168-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
National Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Use in Federally Qualified Health Centers.全国乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查在联邦合格健康中心的应用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jun 1;184(6):671-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0693.
2
Maximizing scarce colonoscopy resources: the crucial role of stool-based tests.最大化稀缺的结肠镜资源:基于粪便的检测的关键作用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 May 8;116(5):647-652. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae022.
3
Rural-Urban Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survivorship Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Association between the red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and risk of colorectal and gastric cancers: a cross-sectional study using NHANES 2005-2018.红细胞分布宽度与白蛋白比值和结直肠癌及胃癌风险之间的关联:一项使用2005 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的横断面研究
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-03871-6.
4
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
城乡间结直肠癌筛查、诊断、治疗和生存护理的差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncologist. 2024 Apr 4;29(4):e431-e446. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad347.
4
Continuous Medicaid coverage during the COVID-19 public health emergency reduced churning, but did not eliminate it.在新冠疫情公共卫生紧急状态期间持续的医疗补助覆盖减少了参保人员的频繁变动,但并未消除这种情况。
Health Aff Sch. 2023 Nov;1(5). doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad055. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
5
Mail-Based Self-Sampling to Complete Colorectal Cancer Screening: Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up Through Implementation Science.基于邮件的自我采样完成结直肠癌筛查:通过实施科学加速结直肠癌筛查和随访。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Dec 7;20:E112. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230083.
6
Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in new settings.优化流程示意图以指导在新环境中实施结直肠癌筛查干预措施。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01769-w. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
7
Implementation strategies in the Exploration and Preparation phases of a colorectal cancer screening intervention in community health centers.社区卫生中心结直肠癌筛查干预探索与准备阶段的实施策略
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 20;4(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00485-5.
8
Reach and effectiveness of a centralized navigation program for patients with positive fecal immunochemical tests requiring follow-up colonoscopy.针对粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性且需要后续结肠镜检查的患者的集中式导航计划的覆盖范围和有效性。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 17;34:102211. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102211. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Duration and Continuity of Medicaid Enrollment Before the COVID-19 Pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行之前,医疗补助计划的参保持续时间和连续性。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224732. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4732.
10
Geographic distribution of colonoscopy providers in the United States: An analysis of medicare claims data.美国结肠镜检查提供者的地理分布:对医疗保险索赔数据的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7673-7678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09083-3. Epub 2022 Jun 21.