Chang Ho-Chun Herbert, Druckman James N, Ferrara Emilio, Willer Robb
Program in Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 27;4(7):pgaf206. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf206. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Social media provides citizens with direct access to information shared by politicians. Citizens, in turn, play a critical role in diffusing such content. Do conservative and liberal citizens differ in their decisions about which representatives' social media content to share? We analyze more than 13 million users' sharing of 1,293,753 messages by US members of Congress on Twitter from 2009 to 2019, leveraging estimates of users' political ideology from over 3.5 billion prior retweets. We find that liberals retweeted statements covering a broader range of issues than conservatives. Liberals also shared statements with content rated as relatively more toxic by a standard classifier. Given well-established tendencies toward political homophily among social media users, our results suggest that, compared to conservatives, liberals will be exposed to a more diverse set of issues and more toxic content originating from elected representatives. We conclude with a discussion of several possible explanations for these patterns.
社交媒体使公民能够直接获取政治家分享的信息。反过来,公民在传播此类内容方面发挥着关键作用。保守派和自由派公民在决定分享哪些代表的社交媒体内容时是否存在差异?我们分析了2009年至2019年美国国会议员在推特上发布的1293753条信息被1300多万用户分享的情况,利用了来自超过35亿条之前转发推文对用户政治意识形态的估计。我们发现,自由派转发的声明所涵盖的问题范围比保守派更广。自由派还分享了被标准分类器评为毒性相对更大的内容。鉴于社交媒体用户中存在既定的政治同质性倾向,我们的结果表明,与保守派相比,自由派将接触到更多样化的问题以及来自当选代表的毒性更大的内容。我们最后讨论了这些模式的几种可能解释。