Zuo Xuzheng, Xu Yongteng, Li Shaojian, Jiang Jingru, Wang Jinyuan, Zhu Yingying, Pan Dong, Li Honghong, Chen Yanting, Chen Yanmin, Rong Xiaoming, Zheng Dong, Lu Kui, Mai Haiqiang, Chen Mingyuan, Chen Pingyan, Li Jinpu, Simone Charles B, Chua Melvin L K, Li Yi, Shen Qingyu, Xiao Songhua, Tang Yamei
Pain Centre, Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Division of Clinical Research Design, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 12;86:103345. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103345. eCollection 2025 Aug.
BACKGROUND: Rapid relief of radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain (RRNP) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is challenging when relying solely on pharmacologic treatments, especially in the early stages of medication. Whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can effectively and rapidly control the RRNP in HNC survivors remains uncertain. METHODS: The RELAX trial was a randomised, parallel, sham-controlled trial conducted at four centres in China. We randomly assigned (1:1) HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP (as defined by Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] score of ≥4) to receive taVNS or sham stimulation (concha of the left ear) for 30 min twice daily over 7 days. Participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians were blinded to assignment and intervention. All patients also received a basal dose of pregabalin (75 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was pain intensity reduction, as measured by the change of NRS scores from baseline to day 7. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05543239. FINDINGS: Between September 16, 2022, and December 1, 2023, 116 eligible patients (mean age, 50.8 [standard deviation (SD), 8.8] years; 40 [34.5%] were women) were randomly assigned into groups. All patients completed NRS score at baseline and day 7, and 112 (96.6%) completed 80% or more of the intervention course. The pain intensity at baseline was 5.79 (SD, 1.59) in the taVNS group and 5.66 (SD, 1.54) in the control group. At day 7, pain intensity decreased by 2.43 (SD, 2.19) in the taVNS group and 1.12 (SD, 1.64) in the Control group; between-group difference, 1.31 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-2.02; P = 0.00042). The most common adverse event (AE) related to taVNS was mild, transient local skin irritations at the electrode site (8.6% versus 1.7%, P = 0.21), and no serious AE were associated with the device. INTERPRETATION: In this trial, taVNS for 7 days at the initial stage of pregabalin treatment resulted in significantly better pain relief in HNC survivors with moderate-to-severe RRNP with no serious AE. Further prospective investigations to observe the longer term effects of taVNS on RRNP are warranted. FUNDING: This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province and Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau.
背景:对于头颈癌(HNC)幸存者而言,仅依靠药物治疗来快速缓解放疗相关神经性疼痛(RRNP)具有挑战性,尤其是在用药初期。经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)能否有效且快速地控制HNC幸存者的RRNP仍不确定。 方法:RELAX试验是一项在中国四个中心开展的随机、平行、假对照试验。我们将中度至重度RRNP(根据数字评分量表[NRS]评分≥4定义)的HNC幸存者以1:1的比例随机分配,分别接受taVNS或假刺激(左耳耳甲),每天两次,每次30分钟,持续7天。参与者、结果评估者和统计人员对分组和干预情况均不知情。所有患者还接受了普瑞巴林的基础剂量(每日两次,每次75毫克)。主要结局是疼痛强度降低,通过从基线到第7天NRS评分的变化来衡量。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT05543239。 结果:在2022年9月16日至2023年12月1日期间,116名符合条件的患者(平均年龄50.8[标准差(SD),8.8]岁;40名[34.5%]为女性)被随机分组。所有患者均在基线和第7天完成了NRS评分,112名(96.6%)完成了80%或更多的干预疗程。taVNS组基线时的疼痛强度为5.79(SD,1.59),对照组为5.66(SD,1.54)。在第7天,taVNS组的疼痛强度降低了2.43(SD,2.19),对照组降低了1.12(SD,1.64);组间差异为1.31分(95%置信区间[CI],0.60 - 2.02;P = 0.00042)。与taVNS相关的最常见不良事件(AE)为电极部位轻度、短暂的局部皮肤刺激(8.6%对1.7%,P = 0.21),且该设备未导致严重AE。 解读:在本试验中,在普瑞巴林治疗初期进行7天的taVNS治疗,能使中度至重度RRNP的HNC幸存者疼痛缓解明显更好,且无严重AE。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究以观察taVNS对RRNP的长期影响。 资助:本研究得到了中华人民共和国科学技术部、中国国家自然科学基金、广东省科学技术厅和广州市科学技术局的支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-9-14
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-11-29
N Engl J Med. 2023-7-13
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-29
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021-8
Br J Nurs. 2021-2-25