文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

评估理论驱动的信息传递以克服冥想障碍:大规模数字实地实验

Evaluating Theory-Driven Messaging to Overcome the Barriers to Meditation: Large-Scale Digital Field Experiment.

作者信息

Bowen Michael, Beam Michael, Semb Joakim, Yoo Dong Whi

机构信息

Kent State University, 1125 Risman Dr., Kent, OH, 44242, United States.

Spotify (Sweden), Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jul 7;12:e71732. doi: 10.2196/71732.


DOI:10.2196/71732
PMID:40698564
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12284605/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The general public is largely aware of meditation, and there is compelling evidence the practice has health benefits. But many people who are aware of meditation have not tried it, and those who do often struggle to establish a regular practice. The barriers to meditation are generally understood and include a lack of knowledge, a lack of time, and unclear benefits. These barriers present an impediment to self-efficacy in establishing a meditation practice. Despite these challenges, current strategies for promoting meditation may fail to address these barriers, leaving a gap in our knowledge about health communication efforts aimed at fostering meditation practices. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research is to leverage a large-scale, real-world digital platform to understand whether breaking down the theory-based barriers to meditation can serve as an effective strategy for encouraging meditation. METHODS: This research is a digital messaging-based experiment that includes approximately 1.33 million people, aged 18 years and older, in the United States. The experiment was conducted on the Spotify mobile app and includes 1 control condition and 4 test conditions. Each of the test conditions was a message that attempted to address a specific barrier to meditation. The control message only included the call-to-action without any theory-based messaging accompaniment. When users clicked the message, they were redirected to meditation content. The click-through rate and the activation rate of each message were the dependent variables in the experiment. RESULTS: The most effective message, which was designed to break down the pragmatic barriers to meditation, had a click-through rate odds ratio (OR) of 1.57 (95% CI 1.52-1.62) and an activation rate OR of 1.55 (95% CI 1.45-1.65), relative to the control. The least effective, which was designed to break down knowledge barriers, had a click-through rate OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) and an activation rate OR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.61-0.71), compared to the control. After 7 days, the differences in people's engagement with the meditation content itself between experimental conditions had substantively diminished. CONCLUSIONS: Theory-driven messaging can potentially encourage people to explore meditation content, but not universally so, given 2 of the experimental conditions performed better than and 2 performed worse than the control. The most successful message broke down the barrier that meditation requires being alone and in a quiet place. Addressing this barrier may have boosted self-efficacy by aligning the practice with everyday settings that fit into people's busy lifestyles. Future researchers might consider how to encourage people to engage in meditation during their daily activities. In addition, breaking down the barriers to meditation through messaging can drive interest and experimentation with meditation content, but may not be enough to compel meaningful behavior change.

摘要

背景:广大公众对冥想大体上有所了解,且有令人信服的证据表明这种做法对健康有益。但许多了解冥想的人并未尝试过,而那些尝试过的人也常常难以养成规律的冥想习惯。人们普遍认为冥想的障碍包括知识匮乏、时间不足以及益处不明确。这些障碍对建立冥想习惯的自我效能构成了阻碍。尽管存在这些挑战,但当前推广冥想的策略可能无法解决这些障碍,这使得我们在旨在促进冥想习惯养成的健康传播方面存在知识空白。 目的:本研究的目的是利用一个大规模的、真实世界的数字平台,来了解打破基于理论的冥想障碍是否能作为鼓励冥想的有效策略。 方法:本研究是一项基于数字信息的实验,涉及美国约133万18岁及以上的人群。该实验在Spotify移动应用上进行,包括1个对照条件和4个测试条件。每个测试条件都是一条试图解决特定冥想障碍的信息。对照信息仅包含行动呼吁,没有任何基于理论的信息辅助。当用户点击该信息时,他们会被重定向到冥想内容。每条信息的点击率和激活率是实验中的因变量。 结果:最有效的信息旨在打破冥想的实际障碍,相对于对照组,其点击率优势比(OR)为1.57(95%CI 1.52 - 1.62),激活率优势比为1.55(95%CI 1.45 - 1.65)。最无效的信息旨在打破知识障碍,与对照组相比,其点击率优势比为0.91(95%CI 0.88 - 0.94),激活率优势比为0.66(95%CI 0.61 - 0.71)。7天后,不同实验条件下人们对冥想内容本身的参与度差异已大幅减小。 结论:理论驱动的信息传递可能会鼓励人们探索冥想内容,但并非普遍如此,因为有2个实验条件的表现优于对照组,2个则不如对照组。最成功的信息打破了冥想需要独处且在安静地方这一障碍。解决这一障碍可能通过使冥想练习与适合人们忙碌生活方式的日常环境相契合,从而增强了自我效能。未来的研究人员或许可以考虑如何鼓励人们在日常活动中进行冥想。此外,通过信息传递打破冥想障碍可以激发对冥想内容的兴趣和尝试,但可能不足以促使有意义的行为改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/12284605/6b8a0d37a773/mental-v12-e71732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/12284605/6b8a0d37a773/mental-v12-e71732-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c755/12284605/6b8a0d37a773/mental-v12-e71732-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Evaluating Theory-Driven Messaging to Overcome the Barriers to Meditation: Large-Scale Digital Field Experiment.

JMIR Ment Health. 2025-7-7

[2]
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training

2025-1

[3]
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.

Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8

[4]
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-7-27

[5]
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.

Autism Adulthood. 2024-12-2

[6]
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.

Autism Adulthood. 2024-9-16

[7]
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20

[8]
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[9]
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-6

[10]
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-6-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effects of Mindfulness Meditation Duration and Type on Well-being: an Online Dose-Ranging Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mindfulness (N Y). 2023

[2]
Situating Meditation Apps Within the Ecosystem of Meditation Practice: Population-Based Survey Study.

JMIR Ment Health. 2023-4-28

[3]
Who Sticks with Meditation? Rates and Predictors of Persistence in a Population-based Sample in the USA.

Mindfulness (N Y). 2023-1

[4]
Digital public health interventions at scale: The impact of social media advertising on beliefs and outcomes related to COVID vaccines.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023-1-31

[5]
Assessing Perceived Barriers to Meditation: the Determinants of Meditation Practice Inventory-Revised (DMPI-R).

Mindfulness (N Y). 2020-5

[6]
Readability of online COVID-19 health information: a comparison between four English speaking countries.

BMC Public Health. 2020-11-13

[7]
Characteristics and Usage Patterns Among 12,151 Paid Subscribers of the Calm Meditation App: Cross-Sectional Survey.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-11-3

[8]
Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-9-25

[9]
Factors Associated with the Use of Meditation, U.S. Adults 2017.

J Altern Complement Med. 2019-8-5

[10]
Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clin Psychol Rev. 2017-11-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索