Suppr超能文献

一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多剂量研究,旨在评估在复发型和进展型多发性硬化症的标准治疗基础上加用艾来赞单抗的安全性和有效性。

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Studies to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Elezanumab when Added to Standard of Care in Relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.

作者信息

Cree Bruce A C, Freedman Mark S, Gold Michael, Pfleeger Kimberly, Schwefel Brittany, Wundes Annette, Ziemann Adam

机构信息

Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2025 Sep;98(3):590-602. doi: 10.1002/ana.27262. Epub 2025 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Elezanumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds repulsive guidance molecule a (RGMa), an inhibitor of central nervous system regeneration after inflammation or injury. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of elezanumab in relapsing and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P were phase 2 trials in relapsing (RADIUS-R) or progressive (RADIUS-P) MS. Participants were randomized to intravenous elezanumab 400mg, 1800mg, or placebo every 4 weeks through week 48. The primary endpoint was the mean Overall Response Score (ORS).

RESULTS

In RADIUS-R, 208 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 69), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 69), or placebo (n = 70). In RADIUS-P, 123 participants received elezanumab 400mg (n = 40), elezanumab 1800mg (n = 40), or placebo (n = 43). The primary endpoint of ORS was not met in either study. For RADIUS-R, mean ORS was -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 400mg and -0.2 with effect size of -0.2 for elezanumab 1800mg. For RADIUS-P, mean ORS was 0.0 with effect size of 0.0 for elezanumab 400mg and 0.1 with effect size of 0.1 for elezanumab 1800mg. Elezanumab was well tolerated; the rate of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups in both studies. Adverse events with ≥10% of elezanumab population were falls, urinary tract infections, headaches in RADIUS-R and RADIUS-P, and also fatigue, infusion-related reactions, and muscular weakness in RADIUS-P.

INTERPRETATION

Elezanumab was safe and well tolerated, but did not meet the primary endpoint in either study. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:590-602.

摘要

目的

埃雷扎umab是一种单克隆抗体,可结合排斥导向分子a(RGMa),RGMa是炎症或损伤后中枢神经系统再生的抑制剂。本研究旨在评估埃雷扎umab在复发型和进展型多发性硬化症(MS)中的安全性和有效性。

方法

RADIUS-R和RADIUS-P是针对复发型(RADIUS-R)或进展型(RADIUS-P)MS的2期试验。参与者被随机分配,每4周静脉注射400mg、1800mg埃雷扎umab或安慰剂,共持续48周。主要终点是平均总体反应评分(ORS)。

结果

在RADIUS-R试验中,208名参与者接受了400mg埃雷扎umab(n = 69)、1800mg埃雷扎umab(n = 69)或安慰剂(n = 70)治疗。在RADIUS-P试验中,123名参与者接受了400mg埃雷扎umab(n = 40)、1800mg埃雷扎umab(n = 40)或安慰剂(n = 43)治疗。两项研究均未达到ORS的主要终点。对于RADIUS-R试验,400mg埃雷扎umab组的平均ORS为-0.2,效应大小为-0.2;1800mg埃雷扎umab组的平均ORS为-0.2,效应大小为-0.2。对于RADIUS-P试验,400mg埃雷扎umab组的平均ORS为0.0,效应大小为0.0;1800mg埃雷扎umab组的平均ORS为0.1,效应大小为0.1。埃雷扎umab耐受性良好;两项研究中各治疗组的严重不良事件发生率相似。在接受埃雷扎umab治疗的人群中,发生率≥10%的不良事件在RADIUS-R和RADIUS-P试验中为跌倒、尿路感染、头痛,在RADIUS-P试验中还包括疲劳、输液相关反应和肌肉无力。

解读

埃雷扎umab安全且耐受性良好,但两项研究均未达到主要终点。《神经病学年鉴》2025年;98:590 - 602。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5df/12392050/49fe2a2ecd6a/ANA-98-590-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验