• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Over 15 Years.疾病修正疗法对复发缓解型多发性硬化症 15 年残疾进展的影响。
Neurology. 2021 Feb 2;96(5):e783-e797. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011242. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
2
Treatment effectiveness of alemtuzumab compared with natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a cohort study.在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和干扰素β相比,阿仑单抗的治疗效果:一项队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Apr;16(4):271-281. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30007-8. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
3
Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.那他利珠单抗停药后,芬戈莫德对比干扰素β/那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的疗效。
Brain. 2015 Nov;138(Pt 11):3275-86. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv260. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
4
Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.初始疾病修饰治疗与随后继发进展性多发性硬化转化的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):175-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.20588.
5
Effectiveness of multiple disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: causal inference to emulate a multiarm randomised trial.多种疾病修饰疗法在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的疗效:因果推理模拟多臂随机试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;94(12):1004-1011. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331499. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Subgroup Analysis From Three International Cohorts.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者:来自三个国际队列的亚组分析。
CNS Drugs. 2021 Nov;35(11):1217-1232. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00860-7. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
7
Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化二线治疗的疗效分析。
Mult Scler. 2018 May;24(6):777-785. doi: 10.1177/1352458518768433. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.用于多发性硬化症的免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2.
9
Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德治疗一线注射治疗应答不佳的复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较。
Mult Scler. 2016 Sep;22(10):1315-26. doi: 10.1177/1352458516650736. Epub 2016 May 26.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant vs Fingolimod, Natalizumab, and Ocrelizumab in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.在高活性复发缓解型多发性硬化症中,自体造血干细胞移植与芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Jul 1;80(7):702-713. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.1184.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining Prognostic Factors in Adult-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of Current Insights.成人多发性硬化症预后因素的细化:当前见解的叙述性综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 11;26(16):7756. doi: 10.3390/ijms26167756.
2
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple-Dose Studies to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Elezanumab when Added to Standard of Care in Relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多剂量研究,旨在评估在复发型和进展型多发性硬化症的标准治疗基础上加用艾来赞单抗的安全性和有效性。
Ann Neurol. 2025 Sep;98(3):590-602. doi: 10.1002/ana.27262. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
3
Progression independent of relapsing biology in multiple sclerosis: a real-word study.多发性硬化症中与复发生物学无关的疾病进展:一项真实世界研究
Front Neurol. 2025 May 29;16:1595929. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1595929. eCollection 2025.
4
Cervical spinal cord gray matter damage predicts disability worsening in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.颈脊髓灰质损伤预示着多发性硬化症患者残疾程度的恶化:一项纵向研究。
J Neurol. 2025 Feb 25;272(3):228. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-12979-4.
5
Contribution of Blood Biomarkers to Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis.血液生物标志物对多发性硬化症诊断的贡献。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Mar;12(2):e200370. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200370. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
6
Effect of autoimmune comorbidities on multiple sclerosis course: An observational multicenter study.自身免疫性合并症对多发性硬化病程的影响:一项多中心观察性研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jan;32(1):e70019. doi: 10.1111/ene.70019.
7
Five-year efficacy outcomes of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A propensity-matched comparison of the OPERA studies with other disease-modifying therapies in real-world lines of treatments.奥瑞珠单抗治疗复发型多发性硬化症的五年疗效结果:OPERA研究与现实世界治疗方案中其他疾病修正疗法的倾向匹配比较
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2024 Sep 13;16:11795735241260563. doi: 10.1177/11795735241260563. eCollection 2024.
8
Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies in Late-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.迟发性多发性硬化症的诊断挑战与治疗策略
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 10;14(4):400. doi: 10.3390/jpm14040400.
9
Is the price right? Paying for value today to get more value tomorrow.价格合理吗?今天为价值买单,明天收获更多价值。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 30;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03262-w.
10
The Importance of Managing Modifiable Comorbidities in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review.管理多发性硬化症患者可改变的合并症的重要性:一项叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 24;13(11):1524. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111524.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Sustained Immunotherapy With Disability Outcomes in Patients With Active Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.持续免疫疗法与活动性继发进展型多发性硬化症患者残疾结局的关联
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Nov 1;77(11):1398-1407. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2453.
2
Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study.多发性硬化症高疗效治疗时机:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr;19(4):307-316. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30067-3. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis.复发型多发性硬化症的早期高效与升级治疗方法。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Oct;18(10):973-980. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30151-6. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
The MSBase registry: Informing clinical practice.MSBase 注册表:为临床实践提供信息。
Mult Scler. 2019 Dec;25(14):1828-1834. doi: 10.1177/1352458519848965. Epub 2019 May 23.
5
Assessing the long-term effectiveness of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: final 10-year results from the UK multiple sclerosis risk-sharing scheme.评估干扰素-β和醋酸格拉替雷在多发性硬化症中的长期疗效:来自英国多发性硬化症风险分担计划的最终 10 年结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;90(3):251-260. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318360. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
6
Association of Inflammation and Disability Accrual in Patients With Progressive-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.炎症与进展性多发性硬化患者残疾累积的相关性。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Nov 1;75(11):1407-1415. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2109.
7
Anti-inflammatory disease-modifying treatment and short-term disability progression in SPMS.抗炎性疾病修饰治疗与继发进展型多发性硬化症的短期残疾进展
Neurology. 2017 Sep 5;89(10):1050-1059. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004330. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
8
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.奥瑞珠单抗与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发型多发性硬化症的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
9
Importance of early treatment initiation in the clinical course of multiple sclerosis.早期开始治疗在多发性硬化临床病程中的重要性。
Mult Scler. 2017 Aug;23(9):1233-1240. doi: 10.1177/1352458516675039. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
The 11-year long-term follow-up study from the randomized BENEFIT CIS trial.来自随机对照的BENEFIT CIS试验的11年长期随访研究。
Neurology. 2016 Sep 6;87(10):978-87. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003078. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

疾病修正疗法对复发缓解型多发性硬化症 15 年残疾进展的影响。

Effect of Disease-Modifying Therapy on Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Over 15 Years.

机构信息

From CORe (T.K., I.D., S.S., C.M.), Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne; MS Centre (T.K., I.D., S.S., C.M.), Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia; Karolinska Institute (T.S.), Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Neuroscience (T.S., V.J., A.v.d.W., O.S., H.B.), Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne; Burnet Institute (T.S.), Melbourne, Australia; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience (D.H., E.K.H.), General University Hospital and Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs (M. Trojano), University of Bari, Italy; Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (G.I.), Sevilla, Spain; Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences (A.L.), University "G. d'Annunzio," Chieti; Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (A.L.), University of Bologna, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italy; Hopital Notre Dame (A.P., M.G., P.D.), Montreal; CHUM and Universite de Montreal (A.P., M.G., P.D.); CISSS Chaudière-Appalache (P.G.), Levis, Canada; Department of Neurology (V.J., A.v.d.W., O.S., H.B.), Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Neuro Rive-Sud (F. Grand'Maison), Quebec, Canada; Department of Neuroscience (P.S., D.F.), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (V.S.), Isfahan, Iran; Amiri Hospital (R. Alroughani), Kuwait City, Kuwait; Zuyderland Ziekenhuis (R.H.), Sittard, the Netherlands; Medical Faculty (M. Terzi), 19 Mayis University, Samsun; KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital (C.B.), Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey; School of Medicine and Public Health (J.L.-S.), University Newcastle; Department of Neurology (J.L.-S.), John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia; UOC Neurologia (E.P.), Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche-AV3, Macerata, Italy; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (V.V.P.), Brussels, Belgium; University of Parma (F. Granella); C. Mondino National Neurological Institute (R.B.), Pavia; Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Giuseppe Moscati Avellino (D.S.), Italy; Flinders University (M. Slee), Adelaide; Westmead Hospital (S.V.), Sydney, Australia; Nemocnice Jihlava (R. Ampapa), Czech Republic; University of Queensland (P.M.), Brisbane; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (P.M.), Brisbane, Australia; Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (C.R.-T.), Badalona, Spain; CSSS Saint-Jérôme (J.P.), Canada; Hospital Universitario Donostia (J.O.), Paseo de Begiristain, San Sebastián, Spain; Hospital Italiano (E.C.), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Brain and Mind Centre (M.B.), University of Sydney, Australia; INEBA-Institute of Neuroscience Buenos Aires (M.L.S.), Argentina; Hospital de Galdakao-Usansolo (J.L.S.-M.), Galdakao, Spain; Liverpool Hospital (S. Hodgkinson), Sydney, Australia; Jahn Ferenc Teaching Hospital (C.R.), Budapest, Hungary; Craigavon Area Hospital (S. Hughes), UK; Jewish General Hospital (F.M.), Montreal, Canada; Deakin University (C.S.), Geelong; Monash Medical Centre (E.B.), Melbourne, Australia; South East Trust (O.G.), Belfast, UK; Perron Institute (A.K.), University of Western Australia, Nedlands; Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases (A.K.), Murdoch University; Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (A.K.), Perth, Australia; Department of Neurology (T.C.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary; Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences (B.S.), Mumbai, India; St Vincents Hospital (N.S.), Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia; Veszprém Megyei Csolnoky Ferenc Kórház zrt (I.P.), Veszprem, Hungary; Royal Hobart Hospital (B.T.), Australia; Semmelweis University Budapest (M. Simo), Hungary; Central Military Emergency University Hospital (C.-A.S.), Bucharest; Titu Maiorescu University (C.-A.S.), Bucharest, Romania; BAZ County Hospital (A.S.), Miskolc, Hungary; and Box Hill Hospital (H.B.), Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Neurology. 2021 Feb 2;96(5):e783-e797. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011242. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000011242
PMID:33372028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7884998/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that immunotherapy prevents long-term disability in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), we modeled disability outcomes in 14,717 patients.

METHODS

We studied patients from MSBase followed for ≥1 year, with ≥3 visits, ≥1 visit per year, and exposed to MS therapy, and a subset of patients with ≥15-year follow-up. Marginal structural models were used to compare the cumulative hazards of 12-month confirmed increase and decrease in disability, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) step 6, and the incidence of relapses between treated and untreated periods. Marginal structural models were continuously readjusted for patient age, sex, pregnancy, date, disease course, time from first symptom, prior relapse history, disability, and MRI activity.

RESULTS

A total of 14,717 patients were studied. During the treated periods, patients were less likely to experience relapses (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.82, = 0.0016), worsening of disability (0.56, 0.38-0.82, = 0.0026), and progress to EDSS step 6 (0.33, 0.19-0.59, = 0.00019). Among 1,085 patients with ≥15-year follow-up, the treated patients were less likely to experience relapses (0.59, 0.50-0.70, = 10) and worsening of disability (0.81, 0.67-0.99, = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Continued treatment with MS immunotherapies reduces disability accrual by 19%-44% (95% CI 1%-62%), the risk of need of a walking aid by 67% (95% CI 41%-81%), and the frequency of relapses by 40-41% (95% CI 18%-57%) over 15 years. This study provides evidence that disease-modifying therapies are effective in improving disability outcomes in relapsing-remitting MS over the long term.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that, for patients with relapsing-remitting MS, long-term exposure to immunotherapy prevents neurologic disability.

摘要

目的

为验证免疫疗法可预防复发缓解型多发性硬化症(MS)的长期残疾这一假设,我们对 14717 名患者的残疾结局进行了建模分析。

方法

我们研究了 MSBase 中随访时间≥1 年、≥3 次就诊、每年≥1 次就诊且接受 MS 治疗的患者,以及具有≥15 年随访的患者子集。使用边缘结构模型比较了治疗期和未治疗期 12 个月内确诊残疾加重和减轻、扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)第 6 步和复发的累积发生率。连续调整了患者年龄、性别、妊娠、日期、病程、首发症状后时间、既往复发史、残疾和 MRI 活动等因素。

结果

共纳入 14717 名患者。在治疗期间,患者发生复发的可能性更低(风险比 0.60,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.43-0.82, = 0.0016),残疾恶化的可能性更低(0.56,0.38-0.82, = 0.0026),进展到 EDSS 第 6 步的可能性更低(0.33,0.19-0.59, = 0.00019)。在 1085 名具有≥15 年随访的患者中,治疗组患者发生复发(0.59,0.50-0.70, = 10)和残疾恶化(0.81,0.67-0.99, = 0.043)的可能性更低。

结论

持续使用 MS 免疫疗法可使残疾累积减少 19%-44%(95%CI 1%-62%),需要使用助行器的风险降低 67%(95%CI 41%-81%),15 年内复发频率降低 40-41%(95%CI 18%-57%)。本研究提供了证据表明,疾病修饰疗法可在长期内改善复发缓解型 MS 的残疾结局。

证据分类

本研究提供了 IV 级证据,表明对于复发缓解型 MS 患者,长期接受免疫治疗可预防神经功能残疾。