Suppr超能文献

对药学院校为未通过北美药剂师执照考试(NAPLEX)的毕业生提供支持情况的调查

An Investigation of College and School of Pharmacy Support for Graduates who Fail the NAPLEX.

作者信息

Anadi Ijeoma S, Woodruff Ashley E, Maerten-Rivera Jaime, Prescott William A

机构信息

University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, United States.

University at Buffalo School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, United States.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2025 Aug;89(8):101465. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101465. Epub 2025 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)-accredited colleges/schools of pharmacy (C/SOP) that support graduates who fail the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) on their first attempt and, secondarily, to characterize the nature and determine the effectiveness of that support.

METHODS

A 19-item electronic survey was designed to assess if and how C/SOP supports graduates who fail the NAPLEX on their first attempt and the perceived effectiveness of this support. The survey, which contained forced-response, Likert, and open-ended items, was distributed to 141 ACPE-accredited C/SOP. Subsequent-attempt pass rates were compared between C/SOP that reported providing (or not providing) support. Descriptive statistics, χ, and t-tests were conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight C/SOP participated (41% response rate). The demographics and mean 3-year first-time NAPLEX pass rates among responding C/SOP were comparable to those of all ACPE-accredited C/SOP. While nearly all C/SOP (97%) acknowledged their responsibility in preparing students for the NAPLEX while enrolled, only 29% indicated supporting graduates who failed the NAPLEX on their first attempt. This was accomplished through the allocation of faculty/staff time and effort (76.5%) and access to college/school resources (64.7%). Those offering support deemed their process somewhat to very effective for improving subsequent-attempt pass rates; however, no difference was observed between C/SOP with or without established processes (57.5% vs 59.8%).

CONCLUSION

Few C/SOP have established support processes for graduates who fail the NAPLEX. Those providing support indicated it was effective; however, there was no correlation to better subsequent-attempt pass rates. While the onus of passing the NAPLEX falls to graduates, C/SOP may consider supporting those who fail the exam, time- and resource-permitting.

摘要

目的

确定药学院校认证委员会(ACPE)认证的药学院支持首次未通过北美药剂师执照考试(NAPLEX)的毕业生的情况,并其次描述这种支持的性质并确定其有效性。

方法

设计了一项包含19个条目的电子调查问卷,以评估药学院是否以及如何支持首次未通过NAPLEX的毕业生,以及这种支持的感知有效性。该调查问卷包含强制回答、李克特量表和开放式问题,分发给141所ACPE认证的药学院。比较了报告提供(或未提供)支持的药学院后续考试通过率。进行了描述性统计、卡方检验和t检验。

结果

58所药学院参与调查(回复率41%)。回复的药学院的人口统计学数据和三年首次NAPLEX平均通过率与所有ACPE认证的药学院相当。虽然几乎所有药学院(97%)都承认在学生入学期间为其准备NAPLEX考试方面负有责任,但只有29%表示支持首次未通过NAPLEX的毕业生。这是通过分配教职员工的时间和精力(76.5%)以及提供学院资源(64.7%)来实现的。提供支持的药学院认为他们的流程在提高后续考试通过率方面有一定到非常有效的作用;然而,在有或没有既定流程的药学院之间未观察到差异(57.5%对59.8%)。

结论

很少有药学院为未通过NAPLEX的毕业生建立支持流程。提供支持的药学院表示这种支持是有效的;然而,与更好的后续考试通过率没有相关性。虽然通过NAPLEX考试的责任落在毕业生身上,但在时间和资源允许的情况下,药学院可以考虑支持那些未通过考试的学生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验