• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

部分膀胱切除术中盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的院内不良结局

Adverse In-hospital Outcomes According to Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Partial Cystectomy.

作者信息

Marmiroli Andrea, Longoni Mattia, Le Quynh Chi, Falkenbach Fabian, Nicolazzini Michele, Catanzaro Calogero, Polverino Federico, Goyal Jordan A, Luzzago Stefano, Mistretta Francesco Alessandro, Piccinelli Mattia, Saad Fred, Shariat Shahrokh F, Briganti Alberto, Chun Felix K H, Graefen Markus, Palumbo Carlotta, Schiavina Riccardo, Longo Nicola, Musi Gennaro, Karakiewicz Pierre I

机构信息

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17841-5.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17841-5
PMID:40702202
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to test the association between adverse in-hospital outcomes and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at partial cystectomy (PC) for nonmetastatic bladder cancer (BCa).

METHODS

We identified patients treated with PC for BCa (National Inpatient Sample 2012-2019). First, estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) tested temporal trends of PLND at PC. Second, descriptive analyses, propensity score matching (PSM, ratio 1:2) and multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were used.

RESULTS

Of 1,289 BCa patients treated with PC, 201 (16.0%) underwent PLND. The rates of PLND at PC decreased from 24.8 to 5.4% over the study span (EAPC - 11.3%; p = 0.01). Pelvic lymph node dissection patients were younger (67 vs. 71 years old; p < 0.001), exhibited a lower number of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] 0: 41% vs. 38%; p = 0.006), and were more frequently admitted to teaching (83% vs. 76%; p = 0.03) and large bedsize (69% vs. 57%; p = 0.004) hospitals. After PSM, 201 of 201 (100%) PLND vs. 402 of 1,088 (36.9%) no-PLND at PC patients were included in further analyses. Pelvic lymph node dissection at PC patients only exhibited significantly higher rate of intraoperative complications (9% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.008), but no statistically significant differences in 13 of 14 other categories were recorded (all p values > 0.09). In multivariable LRMs, PLND independently predicted 2.6-fold higher rate of intraoperative complications (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PLND drastically decreased over time. PLND vs. no-PLND at PC only resulted in a moderate increase in intraoperative complications without differences in 13 other adverse in-hospital outcomes, which included complications, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospital charges.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试非转移性膀胱癌(BCa)行部分膀胱切除术(PC)时,院内不良结局与盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)之间的关联。

方法

我们确定了接受PC治疗的BCa患者(2012 - 2019年国家住院患者样本)。首先,估计年度百分比变化(EAPC)测试PC时PLND的时间趋势。其次,使用描述性分析、倾向评分匹配(PSM,比例1:2)和多变量逻辑回归模型(LRM)。

结果

在1289例接受PC治疗的BCa患者中,201例(16.0%)接受了PLND。在研究期间,PC时PLND的发生率从24.8%降至5.4%(EAPC - 11.3%;p = 0.01)。盆腔淋巴结清扫术患者更年轻(67岁对71岁;p < 0.001),合并症数量更少(Charlson合并症指数[CCI]为0:41%对38%;p = 0.006),更频繁地入住教学医院(83%对76%;p = 0.03)和大型床位医院(69%对57%;p = 0.004)。PSM后,201例接受PLND的患者中的201例(100%)与1088例未接受PLND的患者中的402例(36.9%)纳入进一步分析。PC患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术仅术中并发症发生率显著更高(9%对3.7%;p = 0.008),但在其他14个类别中的13个类别中未记录到统计学显著差异(所有p值> 0.09)。在多变量LRM中,PLND独立预测术中并发症发生率高2.6倍(p = 0.01)。

结论

随着时间的推移,PLND的发生率急剧下降。PC时PLND与未行PLND相比,仅导致术中并发症适度增加,而在包括并发症、院内死亡率、住院时间和总住院费用在内的其他13种院内不良结局方面无差异。

相似文献

1
Adverse In-hospital Outcomes According to Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Partial Cystectomy.部分膀胱切除术中盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的院内不良结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17841-5.
2
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Is It Really Necessary? A Multicentric Longitudinal Study Assessing Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs Radical Prostatectomy Only.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术:真的有必要吗?一项多中心纵向研究,评估接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术与仅接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的肿瘤学结局。
J Urol. 2025 Apr 28:101097JU0000000000004587. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004587.
3
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
4
Impact of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection and Its Extent on Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌患者的盆腔淋巴结清扫术及其范围对围手术期并发症的影响:全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):134-149. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on survival outcomes in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.盆腔淋巴结清扫术对非肌层浸润性膀胱癌生存结局的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03916-6.
6
Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.阴性前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描能否避免新诊断前列腺癌患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫?一项以病理组织学为参考标准的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
7
Lymphadenectomy or sentinel node biopsy for the management of endometrial cancer.用于子宫内膜癌治疗的淋巴结切除术或前哨淋巴结活检术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6(6):CD015786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015786.pub2.
8
Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for Chinese patients with penile cancer: a multicenter collaboration study.中国阴茎癌患者双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项多中心合作研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;143(2):329-335. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2292-3. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: efficacy, limitations, and complications-a systematic review of the literature.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时的盆腔淋巴结清扫术:疗效、局限性和并发症——文献系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.057. Epub 2013 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Race/Ethnicity Affect Secondary Bladder and Rectal Cancer Rates After Prostate Cancer Radiation? Results from a Population-Based Study.种族/族裔是否会影响前列腺癌放疗后的继发性膀胱癌和直肠癌发病率?一项基于人群的研究结果。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02544-0.
2
Cancer-Specific Mortality of Partial Cystectomy Versus Radical Cystectomy in T2N0M0 Urothelial Bladder Cancer.T2N0M0期尿路上皮膀胱癌行部分膀胱切除术与根治性膀胱切除术的癌症特异性死亡率
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17488-2.
3
Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes.
机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:住院不良结局比较
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1002/jso.28108.
4
The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy.慢性肾脏病对根治性前列腺切除术后不良院内结局的影响。
Int J Urol. 2025 Jun;32(6):710-717. doi: 10.1111/iju.70038. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
5
Cirrhosis and liver disease vs. adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical prostatectomy.肝硬化和肝脏疾病与前列腺癌根治术后不良院内结局的关系
Urol Oncol. 2025 Aug;43(8):471.e1-471.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.012. Epub 2025 Mar 8.
6
Survival Outcomes and Temporal Trends of Non-Surgical Management Vs Radical Cystectomy in Non-Organ-Confined Urothelial Bladder Cancer.非器官局限性尿路上皮膀胱癌非手术治疗与根治性膀胱切除术的生存结果及时间趋势
Urology. 2025 Jun;200:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2025.02.051. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
7
The effect of chronic kidney disease on adverse in-hospital outcomes after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion.慢性肾脏病对根治性膀胱切除术后行回肠代膀胱尿流改道术患者住院不良结局的影响。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 5;43(1):149. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05496-6.
8
In-Hospital Outcomes after Robotic Open Radical Nephroureterectomy.机器人辅助开放性根治性肾输尿管切除术后的院内结局
J Endourol. 2025 Feb;39(2):127-134. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0730. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
9
ASO Author Reflections: Urinary Diversion and Adverse in-Hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy: Contemporary Versus Historical Cohorts.ASO作者反思:根治性膀胱切除术后尿流改道与不良院内结局:当代队列与历史队列对比
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2243-2244. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16766-9. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
10
Urinary Diversion Versus Adverse In-Hospital Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后尿流改道术与不良院内结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):2233-2240. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16644-4. Epub 2024 Dec 10.