Mukhtar Rita A, Dimitroff Katrina, Yau Christina, Chien A Jo, Connolly Eileen P, Howard-McNatt Marissa, Rao Roshni, Ladores Velle, Golshan Mehra, Sauder Candice A, Ahmed Kamran, Lancaster Rachael, Fox Jana, Gutnik Lily, Lee M Catherine, Tchou Julia, Prionas Nicolas, Arciero Cletus A, Reyna Chantal, Kuerer Henry, Switalla Kayla, Taunk Neil, Tuttle Todd M, Moran Meena S, Postlewait Lauren M, Perlmutter Jane, DeMichele Angela, Yee Douglas, Hylton Nola, Symmans W Fraser, Rugo Hope S, Shatsky Rebecca, Isaacs Claudine, Esserman Laura J, Van't Veer Laura, Boughey Judy C
UC San Francisco, 1825 4th st, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Columbia University, New York, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17862-0.
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has lower response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) than invasive ductal carcinoma. While ILC often has low-risk biology, there is a high-risk subset within this heterogeneous tumor type. We compared surgical treatment and response rates by histology in I-SPY2, a multicenter NAC trial.
We evaluated 1329 patients with stage II-III breast cancer and high-risk 70-gene assay. Patients with classic, pleomorphic, or mixed lobular/ductal histology were included in the lobular cohort. We evaluated rates of mastectomy, positive margins, axillary dissection, and conversion from clinical node-positive (cN+) to pathologic node-negative (ypN-) status after NAC.
Overall, 124 patients (9.3%) had lobular histology, with 69% being hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-). There was no difference in mastectomy rate (57.2% for lobular vs. 55.8% for non-lobular). The ILC cohort had more positive margins after lumpectomy than the non-ILC cohort (21.2% vs. 7.9%; p = 0.023). Within cN0 cases, axillary dissection was significantly more common among the lobular cases (24.1% vs. 14.0%; p = 0.039). Conversion from cN+ to ypN0 did not differ statistically between lobular and non-lobular cases (40.9% vs. 51.2%; p = 0.11). The nodal conversion rate among cN+lobular tumors was 30.6% in HR+/HER2-, 72.7% in HER2+, and 66.7% in triple-negative cases.
These data demonstrate the challenges of surgical management for ILC but hold promise that molecular classification can improve treatment selection. While high genomic risk is generally less common among ILC, our findings suggest that gene expression assays in cN+ILC patients can identify a subset who may benefit from NAC.
与浸润性导管癌相比,浸润性小叶癌(ILC)对新辅助化疗(NAC)的反应率较低。虽然ILC通常具有低风险生物学特性,但在这种异质性肿瘤类型中存在一个高风险亚组。我们在一项多中心NAC试验I-SPY2中比较了按组织学分类的手术治疗和反应率。
我们评估了1329例II-III期乳腺癌且70基因检测为高风险的患者。具有经典、多形性或混合性小叶/导管组织学特征的患者被纳入小叶队列。我们评估了乳房切除术率、切缘阳性率、腋窝淋巴结清扫率以及NAC后从临床淋巴结阳性(cN+)转为病理淋巴结阴性(ypN-)状态的转化率。
总体而言,124例患者(9.3%)具有小叶组织学特征,其中69%为激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)。乳房切除术率无差异(小叶组为57.2%,非小叶组为55.8%)。与非ILC队列相比,ILC队列在保乳术后切缘阳性的情况更多(21.2%对7.9%;p = 0.023)。在cN0病例中,腋窝淋巴结清扫在小叶病例中明显更常见(24.1%对14.0%;p = 0.039)。小叶和非小叶病例从cN+转为ypN0在统计学上没有差异(40.9%对51.2%;p = 0.11)。cN+小叶肿瘤中,HR+/HER2-病例的淋巴结转化率为30.6%,HER2+病例为72.7%,三阴性病例为66.7%。
这些数据证明了ILC手术管理的挑战,但也表明分子分类有望改善治疗选择。虽然高基因组风险在ILC中通常不太常见,但我们的研究结果表明,对cN+ILC患者进行基因表达检测可以识别出可能从NAC中获益的亚组。