Díez-Noguera A, Casamitjana N, Gris P J, Cambras T, Ribot M
Rev Esp Fisiol. 1985 Sep;41(3):281-5.
Motor activity of twelve rats was recorded by means of two different methods, an optical detection method (ODM) as a mass-independent system and an inductive detection method (IDM) as a mass-dependent system. The chronograms and power spectra obtained from the data were compared to find the essential aspects of both methods. The results suggest that the ODM is more appropriate in studying ultradian rhythms and small motor activity changes, while IDM is better suited to the study of circadian rhythms and gross motor activity variations.
通过两种不同方法记录了12只大鼠的运动活动,一种是作为与质量无关系统的光学检测方法(ODM),另一种是作为与质量有关系统的感应检测方法(IDM)。将从数据中获得的时间图和功率谱进行比较,以找出两种方法的关键方面。结果表明,ODM更适合研究超日节律和微小运动活动变化,而IDM更适合研究昼夜节律和总体运动活动变化。