Suppr超能文献

WHAM研究:使用助听器对社会情感幸福感的影响以及通过改善听力能力的中介作用

The WHAM Study: Socio-Emotional Well-being Effects of Hearing Aid Use and Mediation Through Improved Hearing Ability.

作者信息

Jansen Lotte A, van Wier Marieke F, Lissenberg-Witte Birgit I, Smits Cas, Kramer Sophia E

机构信息

Section Ear and Hearing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001700.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Hearing impairment can negatively impact socio-emotional well-being. While hearing aids (HA) may improve hearing ability, communication, social participation, and emotional well-being, longitudinal studies are scarce and evidence quality is low. This longitudinal study examines the associations between (research question [RQ] 1) HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being, mediation by self-perceived hearing disability, and differences between subgroups, (RQ2) frequency of HA use (daily number of hours) and socio-emotional well-being, and (RQ3) duration of HA use (years of use) and socio-emotional well-being.

DESIGN

Data from October 2006 to January 2024 from the Netherlands Longitudinal Study on Hearing were used for this study. Every 5 yrs, participants were invited to complete an online digits-in-noise hearing test and survey, which included variables on HA use, psychosocial health, tinnitus, hyperacusis, and self-perceived hearing disability. For RQs 1 and 2, cumulative data from three 5-yr intervals (baseline [T0] to 5-yr follow-up [T1], T1-T2, and T2-T3) was compiled, based on eligibility for a HA at the beginning of the studied time interval but not using it at that time and either reporting HA use (HA uptake) or no HA use (no HA uptake) at follow-up and frequency of use at follow-up. Differences between those who adopted a HA versus those who did not were examined while controlling for pre-(non)uptake socio-emotional outcomes. After applying exclusion criteria, the final samples included n = 281 unique participants for RQ1 and n = 280 for RQ2. For RQ3, participants with 5, 10, or 15 yrs of HA use were identified and analyzed to assess the impact of long-term use, with n = 180 unique participants in the final dataset. Outcomes assessed for each RQ were depression, anxiety, distress, somatization, social loneliness, emotional loneliness, and total loneliness. Gamma regression models with generalized estimating equations were performed to analyze all RQs.

RESULTS

Approximately 87% of participants were ≤65 yrs of age at T0. Among individuals without tinnitus, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower depression scores ( p < 0.05). Among those aged >65 yrs, HA uptake was significantly associated with lower total loneliness scores. No significant associations were found between HA uptake and anxiety, somatization, distress, and emotional loneliness. Self-perceived hearing disability did not mediate the relationship between HA uptake and socio-emotional well-being outcomes. No significant associations between the duration of HA use and socio-emotional well-being outcomes were found. Frequency of HA use was not significantly associated with any outcome except somatization, where using a HA for 1 to 4 hrs per day was significantly associated with lower somatization scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This longitudinal study contributes valuable evidence to the growing body of research on the psychosocial benefits of HAs, highlighting both the potential and the limitations of device use in improving well-being. Results suggest that audiologists might consider integrating psychosocial support as part of a comprehensive treatment approach beyond simply recommending HA adoption or increased usage.

摘要

目的

听力障碍会对社会情感幸福感产生负面影响。虽然助听器(HA)可能会改善听力、沟通、社会参与和情感幸福感,但纵向研究较少,证据质量较低。这项纵向研究探讨了以下方面的关联:(研究问题[RQ]1)使用助听器与社会情感幸福感之间的关系、自我感知听力残疾的中介作用以及亚组之间的差异;(RQ2)助听器使用频率(每日使用时长)与社会情感幸福感之间的关系;(RQ3)助听器使用时长(使用年限)与社会情感幸福感之间的关系。

设计

本研究使用了荷兰听力纵向研究中2006年10月至2024年1月的数据。每5年,邀请参与者完成一次在线噪声中数字听力测试和调查,其中包括有关助听器使用、心理社会健康、耳鸣、听觉过敏和自我感知听力残疾的变量。对于RQ1和RQ2,根据研究时间间隔开始时符合使用助听器的条件但当时未使用,并在随访时报告使用助听器(使用助听器)或未使用助听器(未使用助听器)以及随访时的使用频率,汇总了三个5年间隔(基线[T0]至5年随访[T1]、T1 - T2和T2 - T3)的累积数据。在控制(未)使用助听器前的社会情感结果的同时,研究了使用助听器者与未使用者之间的差异。应用排除标准后,RQ1的最终样本包括281名独特参与者,RQ2的最终样本包括280名参与者。对于RQ3,确定并分析了使用助听器5年、10年或15年的参与者,以评估长期使用的影响,最终数据集中有180名独特参与者。每个RQ评估的结果包括抑郁、焦虑、痛苦、躯体化、社交孤独、情感孤独和总孤独感。使用广义估计方程的伽马回归模型对所有RQ进行分析。

结果

在T0时,约87%的参与者年龄≤65岁。在没有耳鸣的个体中,使用助听器与较低的抑郁评分显著相关(p < 0.05)。在年龄>65岁的人群中,使用助听器与较低的总孤独感评分显著相关。未发现使用助听器与焦虑、躯体化、痛苦和情感孤独之间存在显著关联。自我感知听力残疾并未介导使用助听器与社会情感幸福感结果之间的关系。未发现助听器使用时长与社会情感幸福感结果之间存在显著关联。除了躯体化外,助听器使用频率与任何结果均无显著关联,每天使用助听器1至4小时与较低的躯体化评分显著相关。

结论

这项纵向研究为关于助听器心理社会效益的不断增长的研究提供了有价值的证据,突出了设备使用在改善幸福感方面的潜力和局限性。结果表明,听力学家可能会考虑将心理社会支持纳入综合治疗方法的一部分,而不仅仅是简单地推荐使用助听器或增加使用频率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验