Janssens Yann, Siekmann Heike, Canal Pierre, Foley Patrick F, Bettenhäuser-Hartung Lara, Schmid Jonas Q
Private Practice, Bad Essen, Germany; Private practice, Paris, France; Department of Orthodontics, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Private Practice, Bielefeld, Germany.
Int Orthod. 2025 Sep;23(3):101040. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101040. Epub 2025 Jul 24.
There is a lack of evidence regarding whether non-surgical crossbite correction leads to compromised occlusal outcomes. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the quality of the occlusal outcome and the transverse correction after non-surgical crossbite correction in adults compared to adult patients with no pretreatment crossbite.
This retrospective study included 80 adult patients treated consecutively with completely customized lingual appliances (CCLAs) between 2019 and 2021. Crossbite correction was performed with CAD/CAM expansion archwires in the maxilla and compression archwires in the mandible. Occlusal outcome was evaluated using the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) Model Grading System (MGS), and transverse metric measurements were performed, both on plaster models before treatment (T1), on the set-up models (T2A) and after debonding (T2B).
From a total of 1098 patients debonded during the observation period, 40 patients (f/m 30/10, mean age 33.6±10.9years) with unilateral or bilateral crossbite were enrolled in the crossbite group. The matched non-crossbite control group consisted of 40 Class I patients (f/m 30/10, mean age 30.7±9.1years). No statistically significant difference was observed between the crossbite and non-crossbite groups regarding the total ABO score at T2B (20.7 vs. 18.8, p>0.05), despite the malocclusion being significantly more severe in the crossbite group at T1 (68.1 vs. 41.0, p<0.001). In both groups, 38 out of 40 patients (95%) would have passed the ABO examination (total score at T2B≤25). All crossbites were completely corrected at T2B, with a mean total transverse correction of 6.7±2.3mm (3.2±2.1mm maxillary expansion, 3.5±2.4mm mandibular compression).
Non-surgical crossbite correction did not lead to compromised occlusal results. CCLAs in combination with CAD/CAM expansion and compression archwires can correct posterior crossbites successfully in adult patients. The final occlusal outcome can be of a similar high quality in crossbite and non-crossbite patients.
关于非手术性反合矫治是否会导致咬合结果受损,目前缺乏证据。本研究的目的是客观评估成年患者非手术性反合矫治后的咬合结果质量和横向矫治情况,并与未进行过反合矫治的成年患者进行比较。
本回顾性研究纳入了2019年至2021年间连续接受完全定制舌侧矫治器(CCLAs)治疗的80例成年患者。采用上颌CAD/CAM扩弓丝和下颌压缩弓丝进行反合矫治。使用美国正畸委员会(ABO)模型分级系统(MGS)评估咬合结果,并在治疗前(T1)、排牙模型(T2A)和拆除矫治器后(T2B)的石膏模型上进行横向测量。
在观察期内拆除矫治器的1098例患者中,40例单侧或双侧反合患者(女30例/男10例,平均年龄33.6±10.9岁)纳入反合组。匹配的非反合对照组由40例I类患者组成(女30例/男10例,平均年龄30.7±9.1岁)。尽管反合组在T1时错合畸形明显更严重(68.1对41.0,p<0.001),但在T2B时反合组和非反合组的ABO总分差异无统计学意义(20.7对18.8,p>0.05)。两组中,40例患者中有38例(95%)通过了ABO检查(T2B总分≤25)。所有反合在T2B时均完全矫正,平均总横向矫正量为6.7±2.3mm(上颌扩弓3.2±2.1mm,下颌压缩3.5±2.4mm)。
非手术性反合矫治不会导致咬合结果受损。CCLAs联合CAD/CAM扩弓和压缩弓丝可成功矫治成年患者的后牙反合。反合患者和非反合患者最终的咬合结果质量相似。