Moore-Gillon J C, George R J, Geddes D M
Thorax. 1985 Nov;40(11):817-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.40.11.817.
Oxygen administration via a nasal cannula incorporating a small collapsible reservoir (Oxymizer, Chad Therapeutics Inc, California) was compared with delivery via a standard nasal cannula. Twelve patients with chronic, stable hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen tension less than 60 mm Hg (8.0 kPa)) were studied. Transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions were recorded by skin electrodes and oxygen saturation by ear oximetry. Baseline measurements during the breathing of air were compared with those made during the breathing of oxygen at flow rates of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 l/min via each device. Increases in saturation and transcutaneous oxygen tension were significantly greater at each flow rate with the reservoir device than with the conventional cannula. To produce similar improvements in oxygenation the reservoir device required an oxygen flow rate about half that of the conventional cannula. Use of the reservoir device may reduce the inconvenience and perhaps the cost of supplying domiciliary oxygen, and prolong the time during which patients may rely on a portable cylinder.
将通过带有小型可折叠储氧器的鼻导管(Oxymizer,Chad Therapeutics Inc,加利福尼亚州)输氧与通过标准鼻导管输氧进行比较。对12例慢性稳定型低氧血症患者(动脉血氧分压低于60 mmHg(8.0 kPa))进行了研究。通过皮肤电极记录经皮氧分压和二氧化碳分压,并通过耳部血氧测定法记录血氧饱和度。将呼吸空气时的基线测量值与通过每种设备以0.5、1.0和2.0 l/min的流速呼吸氧气时的测量值进行比较。在每个流速下,使用储氧器设备时饱和度和经皮氧分压的增加均显著大于使用传统鼻导管时。为了产生相似的氧合改善效果,储氧器设备所需的氧流速约为传统鼻导管的一半。使用储氧器设备可能会减少家庭输氧的不便,或许还能降低成本,并延长患者依靠便携式氧气瓶的时间。