Civino Adele, Diomeda Federico, Burrone Marco, Natoli Valentina, Ravelli Angelo
Division of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
Division of Rheumatology and Autoinflammatory Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Biologics. 2025 Jul 23;19:425-441. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S486359. eCollection 2025.
The "biologic era" in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has begun in the year 2000, with the publication of the randomized controlled trial on etanercept. In the subsequent years, there has been continued progress, marked by the availability of new therapeutic agents and the shift towards early aggressive interventions. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. In parallel with the growing use of the novel biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the real world of clinical practice, additional information has been gained about their effectiveness and safety. Furthermore, the role of the various bDMARDs in the management of the different JIA categories and of the main disease complications and comorbidities has been scrutinized. Innovative management strategies, such as the step-down and the treat-to-target, have been proposed to maximize the therapeutic benefits through the optimal combination of the newer and conventional medications. However, despite this progress several unmet needs remain, including the lack of well-established criteria for medication discontinuation after the attainment of sustained disease remission and of effective alternatives for patients who respond inadequately to the contemporary therapeutic modalities. The research agenda also calls for the search for reliable early predictors of therapeutic response that foster personalization of treatment and increase its precision. The aim of this Review is to summarize the evidence obtained in the past 5 years in the field of biologic therapy for JIA and to discuss the remaining gaps and the future perspectives of the use of these medications.
2000年,随着关于依那西普的随机对照试验的发表,青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)治疗的“生物制剂时代”拉开了帷幕。在随后的几年里,该领域持续取得进展,新治疗药物的出现以及向早期积极干预的转变便是明证。此外,治疗建议和指南的颁布促成了更合理的治疗方法。在临床实践的现实世界中,随着新型生物改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)的使用日益增多,人们对其有效性和安全性有了更多了解。此外,还对各种bDMARDs在不同类型JIA以及主要疾病并发症和合并症管理中的作用进行了审视。为了通过新老药物的最佳组合实现最大治疗效益,人们提出了诸如逐步减量和达标治疗等创新管理策略。然而,尽管取得了这些进展,仍有一些未满足的需求,包括在实现持续疾病缓解后缺乏明确的停药标准,以及对于当代治疗方式反应不佳的患者缺乏有效的替代方案。研究议程还要求寻找可靠的治疗反应早期预测指标,以促进治疗的个性化并提高其精准度。本综述的目的是总结过去5年在JIA生物治疗领域所获得的证据,并讨论这些药物使用方面仍然存在的差距以及未来前景。