Denisova Masha, Zvonareva Olga, Horstman Klasien
Faculty of Health, Medicine, Life Sciences, Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Health Inequities and Societal Participation (HISP), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Med Anthropol Q. 2025 Sep;39(3):e70016. doi: 10.1111/maq.70016. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
Critical social science research demonstrates that evidence-based medicine (EBM) emerged through its proponents' deliberate efforts to defend EBM's knowledge production methods as credible and independent of commercial interests. In the present study, we expand this discussion by showing how EBM is co-produced with profit-making within the context of private clinics in Russia. Drawing on the ethnography of three private clinics in Russia, we explore how they strategically articulate EBM ideals to demarcate the boundaries between good and bad medical practices. We identified four forms of boundary work that private clinics perform to define their epistemic culture as different from those applying poor quality evidence, providing harmful prescriptions, over-relying on clinical experience, and practicing a top-down approach in patient relations. We discuss how, in the Russian healthcare context, EBM, instead of becoming the opposite of commerce, has become interwoven with and even dependent on private healthcare.
批判性社会科学研究表明,循证医学(EBM)是通过其支持者的刻意努力而出现的,他们致力于捍卫循证医学的知识生产方法,使其可信且独立于商业利益。在本研究中,我们通过展示循证医学在俄罗斯私人诊所的背景下是如何与盈利共同产生的,来扩展这一讨论。基于对俄罗斯三家私人诊所的人种志研究,我们探讨了它们如何战略性地阐述循证医学理念,以划分良好与不良医疗实践之间的界限。我们确定了私人诊所进行的四种边界工作形式,这些工作旨在将其认知文化定义为不同于那些采用低质量证据、提供有害处方、过度依赖临床经验以及在医患关系中采用自上而下方法的诊所。我们讨论了在俄罗斯医疗保健背景下,循证医学非但没有与商业对立,反而与私人医疗保健相互交织甚至依赖。