De Stefano Pia, Hofmeijer Jeannette, Quintard Hervé, Damien Charlotte, Misirocchi Francesco, Caroyer Sarah, Horn Janneke, Tromp Selma, Kornips Bert, Hilkman Danny, van Mook Walther, Hoedemaekers Cornelia, Annoni Filippo, Legros Benjamin, Seeck Margitta, Van Putten Michel J A M, Gaspard Nicolas
Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.
EEG & Epilepsy Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland.
Neurology. 2025 Aug 26;105(4):e213913. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213913. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
The prognostic significance and the benefits of antiseizure treatment for definite and possible status epilepticus (SE) after cardiac arrest (CA) remain debated. The study aims to identify clinical and EEG predictors of outcome in definite and possible SE after CA and to determine patient categories in which antiseizure medication is useful.
We conducted a multicenter pooled analysis of individual patient data from the Treatment of ELectroencephalographic STatus epilepticus After cardiopulmonary Resuscitation trial and 2 local registries (Brussels and Geneva). Patients with EEG patterns fulfilling the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society criteria for definite or possible SE within 72 hours after CA were included. Primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) at 3 months, dichotomized as good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5). Patients, clinical, EEG, and treatment characteristics were related to outcome using univariate and multivariate analyses in the whole cohort and separate for patients without ≥2 poor outcome European Resuscitation Council (ERC)/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) criteria. This latter group of patients was further divided into 2 subgroups: those with definite SE and those with possible SE.
Of 274 patients (median age 66 [interquartile range (IQR) 55-75], 31% female) with definite or possible SE, 24 (8.8%) had good recovery. In multivariate analysis, nonmotor semiology and SE cessation were associated with good recovery. After exclusion of patients with ≥2 poor outcome ERC/ESICM criteria (180 patients), we included 94 patients (52 definite SE and 42 possible SE), 25% having good outcome. In definite SE, SE cessation (12 [100%] vs 20 [50%], = 0.002), higher discharge frequency (3 Hz [IQR 2-3] vs 2 Hz [IQR 2-3], = 0.024), guideline-recommended SE treatment (12 [100%] vs 28 [70%], = 0.047), and higher doses of levetiracetam (4,250 [IQR 3,750-4,500] mg vs 2,000 [IQR 2,000-3,000] mg, = 0.001) and valproic acid (4,800 [IQR 3,600-5,400] mg vs 2,000 [IQR 1,850-2,250] mg, = 0.032) were associated with favorable outcome. None of the definite or possible SE patients with good outcome had a suppressed/suppression-burst background before SE onset.
Patients with postanoxic definite or possible SE have a 25% chance of good outcome in the absence of ≥2 poor outcome ERC/ESICM factors. EEG background continuity before SE onset and higher discharge frequency contribute to the identification of patients who may benefit from protracted treatment.
心脏骤停(CA)后确诊和疑似癫痫持续状态(SE)的抗癫痫治疗的预后意义及益处仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定CA后确诊和疑似SE患者预后的临床及脑电图预测因素,并确定抗癫痫药物有用的患者类别。
我们对心肺复苏后脑电图癫痫持续状态治疗试验及2个本地登记处(布鲁塞尔和日内瓦)的个体患者数据进行了多中心汇总分析。纳入CA后72小时内脑电图模式符合美国临床神经生理学会确诊或疑似SE标准的患者。主要结局为3个月时的脑功能分类(CPC),分为良好(CPC 1 - 2)或不良(CPC 3 - 5)。在整个队列中,使用单变量和多变量分析将患者、临床、脑电图及治疗特征与结局相关联,并对无≥2项不良结局欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)/欧洲重症监护医学学会(ESICM)标准的患者进行单独分析。后一组患者进一步分为2个亚组:确诊SE患者和疑似SE患者。
在274例确诊或疑似SE患者中(中位年龄66岁[四分位间距(IQR)55 - 75],31%为女性),24例(8.8%)恢复良好。在多变量分析中,非运动性症状学和SE终止与良好恢复相关。排除有≥2项不良结局ERC/ESICM标准的患者(180例)后,我们纳入94例患者(52例确诊SE和42例疑似SE),25%恢复良好。在确诊SE中,SE终止(12例[100%]对20例[50%],P = 0.002)、更高的放电频率(3 Hz[IQR 2 - 3]对2 Hz[IQR 2 - 3],P = 0.024)、指南推荐的SE治疗(12例[100%]对28例[70%],P = 0.047)以及更高剂量的左乙拉西坦(4250[IQR 3750 - 4500]mg对2000[IQR 2000 - 3,000]mg,P = 0.001)和丙戊酸(4800[IQR 3600 - 5400]mg对2000[IQR 1850 - 2250]mg,P = 0.032)与良好结局相关。在SE发作前,恢复良好的确诊或疑似SE患者均无抑制/抑制 - 爆发背景。
在无≥2项不良结局ERC/ESICM因素的情况下,缺氧后确诊或疑似SE患者有25%的机会恢复良好。SE发作前脑电图背景的连续性及更高的放电频率有助于识别可能从长期治疗中获益的患者。