Hua Xiaofan, Wang Gang, Li Bin, Shen Genhai, Liu Wei
Department of Minimally Invasive Common Surgery, Suzhou Ninth People's Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University Suzhou Bay Clinical College, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, 215200, China.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06210-2.
With the aging population, the incidence of choledocholithiasis in elderly patients is increasing. Since interventional endoscopy cannot address gallbladder stones, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is more suitable for elderly patients. However, there is still controversy over whether primary suture of the common bile duct or T-tube drainage is more appropriate for elderly patients. This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of these two methods in treating elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with choledocholithiasis, comparing their surgical safety, complication rates, postoperative recovery, and long-term outcomes.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis (or combined with gallbladder stones), aged 70 years or older, and who underwent laparoscopic primary suture of the common bile duct (PC group, 45 cases) or T-tube drainage (TD group, 52 cases) in our hospital from January 1, 2022, to October 30, 2023. The preoperative characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative recovery of the PC and TD groups were compared.
The PC group had shorter operative time, common bile duct suture time, bowel function recovery time, 6-day postoperative VAS, total hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay compared to the TD group. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups, with both experiencing cases of pulmonary infection (PC: 3 cases, TD: 2 cases), cardiovascular events (PC: 2 cases, TD: 1 case), and bile leakage (PC: 3 cases, TD: 4 cases). Additionally, the TD group had 3 cases of T-tube site wound infection, 3 cases of acute cholangitis, and 2 cases of readmission within 30 days post-discharge. After a median follow-up of 16 months, no residual or recurrent stones or biliary duct strictures were observed in either group.
Laparoscopic primary suture of the common bile duct avoids some complications associated with T-tube drainage and offers advantages such as less trauma, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay. For elderly patients with clear indications, this surgical method is a safe and feasible option.
随着人口老龄化,老年患者胆总管结石的发病率不断上升。由于介入性内镜无法处理胆囊结石,腹腔镜胆总管探查术更适合老年患者。然而,对于老年患者,胆总管一期缝合还是T管引流更为合适仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨这两种方法治疗老年(≥70岁)胆总管结石患者的临床疗效,比较其手术安全性、并发症发生率、术后恢复情况及长期预后。
对2022年1月1日至2023年10月30日在我院接受腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合(PC组,45例)或T管引流(TD组,52例)的97例年龄70岁及以上、诊断为胆总管结石(或合并胆囊结石)的患者进行回顾性分析。比较PC组和TD组的术前特征、术中结果及术后恢复情况。
与TD组相比,PC组手术时间、胆总管缝合时间、肠功能恢复时间、术后6天视觉模拟评分、总住院时间及术后住院时间更短。两组术后并发症无显著差异,均有肺部感染(PC组:3例,TD组:2例)、心血管事件(PC组:2例,TD组:1例)及胆漏(PC组:3例,TD组:4例)发生。此外,TD组有3例T管部位伤口感染、3例急性胆管炎及2例出院后30天内再次入院。中位随访16个月后,两组均未观察到残留或复发性结石或胆管狭窄。
腹腔镜胆总管一期缝合避免了一些与T管引流相关的并发症,具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短等优点。对于有明确指征的老年患者,这种手术方法是一种安全可行的选择。