Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胆道探查术后胆管结石患者的一期缝合:一项回顾性队列研究

Primary suture for patients of bile duct stones after laparoscopic biliary tract exploration: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Zhang DengYong, Ma Yang, Sun Wanliang, Wang Ning, Liu Zhong, Lu Zheng

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, NO. 287, Changhuai Road, Longzihu District, Bengbu, 233000, Anhui, China.

Department of Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, 233000, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):897-903. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01451-5. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

There are still many physicians who are reluctant to use primary biliary suture in Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for fear of more complications. We compare and analyze the clinical effectiveness of bile duct primary suture with three laparoscopic ports and indwelling T-tube drainage (with four laparoscopic ports) in patients with choledocholithiasis after LCBDE. Clinical data of 135 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stone were compared, including general conditions, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospitalization costs, postoperative follow-up and other indicators. Forty-eight patients underwent primary suture of bile duct (group A) and 87 were treated with external T-tube drainage (group B). There were no significant differences between the two groups neither relating to the age, gender, BMI, diameter of CBD, number of stones, preoperative bilirubin value, number of previous surgeries in preoperative, nor the operation time, residual stones, the number of cases converted from laparoscopic conversion to laparotomy. The postoperative complications like fever, bleeding, incision infection, bile duct stricture has no differences between two group. The incidence of bile leakage (p = 0.008) and postoperative electrolyte disturbance (p = 0.001) were slightly lower in group A. There were fewer postoperative complications in group A vs group B (p = 0.04). Patients in group A experienced shorter postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001), earlier postoperative extubation (p < 0.001), lower total hospitalization costs (p = 0.03), and earlier postoperative recovery (p = 0.000). Primary suture of CBD is a safe and effective method for some patients after LCBDE.

摘要

仍有许多医生因担心更多并发症而不愿在腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)中使用胆管一期缝合术。我们比较并分析了胆管一期缝合术(三个腹腔镜端口)与留置T管引流术(四个腹腔镜端口)在LCBDE术后胆总管结石患者中的临床效果。比较了135例胆总管结石患者的临床资料,包括一般情况、术后住院时间、术后并发症、住院费用、术后随访等指标。48例患者接受胆管一期缝合术(A组),87例接受T管外引流术(B组)。两组在年龄、性别、BMI、胆总管直径、结石数量、术前胆红素值、术前既往手术次数、手术时间、残余结石、腹腔镜中转开腹病例数方面均无显著差异。两组术后发热、出血、切口感染、胆管狭窄等并发症无差异。A组胆漏发生率(p = 0.008)和术后电解质紊乱发生率(p = 0.001)略低。A组术后并发症少于B组(p = 0.04)。A组患者术后住院时间较短(p < 0.001)、术后拔管较早(p < 0.001)、总住院费用较低(p = 0.03)、术后恢复较早(p = 0.000)。胆总管一期缝合术对部分LCBDE术后患者是一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验