Kozlowska Katarzyna, Radecka Weronika, Brodowska Sonia, Chambily Lucile, Kuc Dominika, Lopez Amber, Siemionow Maria
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 3;13(7):1633. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071633.
: Numerous experimental studies aim to improve outcomes of peripheral nerve repair following trauma. This study evaluates the efficacy of the human epineural patch (hEP) compared to the human amniotic membrane (hAM) in promoting nerve regeneration following sciatic nerve crush injury. : Thirty-six athymic nude rats were divided into three groups ( = 12 per group) following nerve crush: (1) an unprotected injury site; (2) crush injury wrapped with hEP; and (3) crush injury wrapped with hAM. Animals were assessed over 6 or 12 weeks post-injury. Evaluations included motor recovery (Toe-Spread test), sensory recovery (Pinprick test), muscle denervation atrophy (the gastrocnemius muscle index (GMI)), histomorphometry (myelin thickness, axonal density, fiber diameter, and percentage of myelinated fibers), and immunofluorescence (GFAP, Laminin B, NGF, S-100, VEGF, vWF, HLA-DR, and HLA-I) assessments. : The hEP group showed superior motor recovery, axonal density and higher GMI values compared to the hAM and control groups. The increased expression of neurogenic and angiogenic markers highlighted its neuroregenerative potential. Negligible HLA-DR and HLA-I expression confirmed the lack of hEP and hAM immunogenicity. : The application of hEP following sciatic nerve crush injury facilitated nerve regeneration, improved functional outcomes, and offered a viable alternative to hAM. Structural stability and the regenerative capacity position hEP as a new, promising off-the-shelf product for nerve regeneration.
许多实验研究旨在改善创伤后周围神经修复的结果。本研究评估了人神经外膜补片(hEP)与人类羊膜(hAM)相比,在坐骨神经挤压伤后促进神经再生的效果。36只无胸腺裸鼠在神经挤压伤后被分为三组(每组 = 12只):(1)未保护的损伤部位;(2)用hEP包裹的挤压伤;(3)用hAM包裹的挤压伤。在损伤后6周或12周对动物进行评估。评估包括运动恢复(趾展试验)、感觉恢复(针刺试验)、肌肉去神经萎缩(腓肠肌指数(GMI))、组织形态计量学(髓鞘厚度、轴突密度、纤维直径和有髓纤维百分比)以及免疫荧光(GFAP、层粘连蛋白B、NGF、S-100、VEGF、vWF、HLA-DR和HLA-I)评估。与hAM组和对照组相比,hEP组显示出更好的运动恢复、轴突密度和更高的GMI值。神经源性和血管生成标志物表达的增加突出了其神经再生潜力。可忽略不计的HLA-DR和HLA-I表达证实了hEP和hAM缺乏免疫原性。坐骨神经挤压伤后应用hEP促进了神经再生,改善了功能结果,并为hAM提供了一种可行的替代方案。结构稳定性和再生能力使hEP成为一种新型、有前景的现成神经再生产品。