Pagliaro Pasquale, Alloatti Giuseppe, Penna Claudia
Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
National Institute for Cardiovascular Research (INRC), 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;14(7):889. doi: 10.3390/antiox14070889.
Over the past four decades, cardioprotective research has revealed an extraordinary complexity of cellular and molecular mechanisms capable of mitigating ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). Among these, ischemic conditioning has emerged as one of the most influential discoveries: brief episodes of ischemia followed by reperfusion activate protective programs that reduce myocardial damage. These effects can be elicited locally (pre- or postconditioning) or remotely (remote conditioning), acting mainly through paracrine signaling and mitochondria-linked kinase pathways, with both early and delayed windows of protection. We have contributed to clarifying the roles of mitochondria, oxidative stress, prosurvival kinases, connexins, extracellular vesicles, and sterile inflammation, particularly via activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Despite robust preclinical evidence, clinical translation of these approaches has remained disappointing. The challenges largely stem from experimental models that poorly reflect real-world clinical settings-such as advanced age, comorbidities, and multidrug therapy-as well as the reliance on surrogate endpoints that do not reliably predict clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, interest in multi-target protective strategies remains strong. New lines of investigation are focusing on emerging mediators-such as gasotransmitters, extracellular vesicles, and endogenous peptides-as well as targeted modulation of inflammatory responses. Future perspectives point toward personalized cardioprotection tailored to patient metabolic and immune profiles, with special attention to high-risk populations in whom IRI continues to represent a major clinical challenge.
在过去的四十年里,心脏保护研究揭示了一系列能够减轻缺血/再灌注损伤(IRI)的细胞和分子机制,其复杂性超乎寻常。其中,缺血预处理已成为最具影响力的发现之一:短暂的缺血发作后再灌注可激活保护程序,减少心肌损伤。这些效应可在局部(预处理或后处理)或远程(远程预处理)引发,主要通过旁分泌信号传导和线粒体相关激酶途径起作用,具有早期和延迟保护窗口。我们在阐明线粒体、氧化应激、促生存激酶、连接蛋白、细胞外囊泡和无菌性炎症的作用方面做出了贡献,特别是通过激活NLRP3炎性小体。尽管有强有力的临床前证据,但这些方法的临床转化仍然令人失望。挑战主要源于实验模型不能很好地反映现实世界的临床情况,如高龄、合并症和多药治疗,以及依赖不能可靠预测临床结果的替代终点。然而,对多靶点保护策略的兴趣依然浓厚。新的研究方向聚焦于新兴介质,如气体信号分子、细胞外囊泡和内源性肽,以及对炎症反应的靶向调节。未来的前景指向根据患者的代谢和免疫特征量身定制的个性化心脏保护,特别关注IRI仍然是主要临床挑战的高危人群。