Esteban Caleb, Torres-Blasco Normarie, Ramos-Pibernus Alíxida
Queer Biopsychosocial Health Laboratory (The Queer Lab), School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico.
Ponce Research Institute, Ponce 00716, Puerto Rico.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 24;22(7):992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22070992.
The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework (NIMHD-RF) provides a multidimensional structure to examine health disparities across domains and levels of influence. While influential, its current Behavioral Domain centers on observable behaviors and underrepresents key psychological factors and determinants that shape health outcomes among minoritized populations. This gap limits the framework's capacity to account for complex factors such as internalized stigma, identity-related stress, and cultural processes that significantly contribute to mental health disparities. In this viewpoint, we propose an adaptation of the Behavioral Domain into a Psychological/Behavioral Domain to better reflect the interconnected psychological, biological, sociocultural, and environmental factors influencing health. The revised domain incorporates psychological vulnerabilities, coping strategies, and identity-based stressors across all levels of influence, from individual to societal, and acknowledges macro-level processes such as structural stigma and inequitable policies. This reframing emphasizes that behaviors are shaped by psychological experiences and systemic inequities, not merely individual choice. By explicitly integrating psychological factors and determinants, the framework becomes more robust in guiding culturally responsive, equity-driven research and interventions. This adaptation aims to enhance the framework's utility in mental health disparities research and to support efforts to achieve health equity for historically underserved populations.
美国国立少数族裔健康与健康差异研究所研究框架(NIMHD-RF)提供了一个多维结构,用于审视不同领域和影响层面的健康差异。尽管该框架具有影响力,但其当前的行为领域以可观察到的行为为核心,未能充分体现塑造少数族裔群体健康结果的关键心理因素和决定因素。这一差距限制了该框架解释内化耻辱感、身份认同相关压力以及对心理健康差异有重大影响的文化过程等复杂因素的能力。在本文观点中,我们提议将行为领域调整为心理/行为领域,以更好地反映影响健康的心理、生物、社会文化和环境因素之间的相互联系。修订后的领域纳入了从个体到社会各个影响层面的心理脆弱性、应对策略和基于身份的压力源,并承认诸如结构性耻辱感和不公平政策等宏观层面的过程。这种重新构建强调行为是由心理体验和系统性不平等塑造的,而不仅仅是个人选择。通过明确整合心理因素和决定因素,该框架在指导具有文化敏感性、公平驱动的研究和干预方面变得更加强有力。这种调整旨在提高该框架在心理健康差异研究中的效用,并支持为历史上服务不足的人群实现健康公平所做的努力。