Hoffman J R, Igarashi E
Am J Med. 1985 Dec;79(6):699-707. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90520-0.
This study prospectively evaluated the influence of current electrocardiograms obtained at the time of emergency department presentation, as well as that of previous comparison electrocardiograms, on decision-making regarding coronary care unit admission of patients presenting with a chief complaint of chest pain or chest pain equivalent. Emergency department physicians were asked to commit themselves to recommending either coronary care unit admission or some other disposition, both before and after evaluating current comparison electrocardiographic findings. They were also asked, prior to reviewing these results, whether they thought information gained from the electrocardiograms would have any affect on their decision. Despite wide expectation that electrocardiographic findings would in fact affect decision-making, neither current nor comparison electrocardiograms virtually ever altered the ultimate decision of whether or not to admit. Faculty and house officers performed similarly in all regards, except insofar as attending physicians were less likely to expect electrocardiographic findings to help them in patients who were ultimately discharged. Emergency department nurses, who were asked whether they believed these patients needed admission to a coronary care unit on the basis of only a brief initial triage history, performed very similarly to the physicians. Thus, electrocardiographic findings are rarely if ever helpful in determining the need for admission to a coronary care unit in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain, and seem to have particularly little value in patients in whom myocardial infarction is considered clinically unlikely. Although physicians at all levels of training often feel a need to rely on electrocardiograms in patients they ultimately admit, greater experience allows more senior physicians to be comfortable in correctly discharging patients with no clinical evidence of disease without obtaining an electrocardiogram. Routine ordering of electrocardiograms in patients with chest pain in whom likelihood of significant acute ischemic pain is clinically low should be reconsidered.
本研究前瞻性评估了急诊科就诊时获取的当前心电图以及之前的对照心电图,对以胸痛或等效胸痛为主诉的患者入住冠心病监护病房决策的影响。在评估当前对照心电图结果之前和之后,要求急诊科医生做出决定,推荐患者入住冠心病监护病房或采取其他处置方式。在查看这些结果之前,还询问他们是否认为从心电图中获得的信息会对其决策产生任何影响。尽管人们普遍预期心电图结果实际上会影响决策,但当前心电图和对照心电图几乎从未改变最终的入院决定。在所有方面,教员和住院医师的表现相似,但主治医师不太可能期望心电图结果对最终出院的患者有帮助。急诊科护士仅根据简短的初始分诊病史被询问是否认为这些患者需要入住冠心病监护病房,其表现与医生非常相似。因此,对于因胸痛到急诊科就诊的患者,心电图结果在确定是否需要入住冠心病监护病房方面几乎没有帮助,而且对于临床上认为心肌梗死可能性不大的患者似乎尤其没有价值。尽管各级培训的医生在最终收治的患者中常常觉得需要依靠心电图,但经验更丰富的资深医生在没有临床疾病证据的情况下正确让患者出院而不做心电图时会更放心。对于临床上急性严重缺血性疼痛可能性较低的胸痛患者,应重新考虑常规开具心电图检查。