Habe Bernarda, Črešnovar Tanja, Petelin Ana, Kenig Saša, Mohorko Nina, Jenko Pražnikar Zala
Faculty of Health Science, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, Slovenia.
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2025 Jul 29;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00984-3.
It remains unclear whether adding time-restricted eating (TRE) to energy restriction (ER) offers additional cardiometabolic benefits, particularly in metabolic hormone regulation, and insulin sensitivity. This per-protocol analysis assessed whether early TRE (eTRE) or late TRE (lTRE), when combined with ER, additionally improves insulin resistance indexes, and cardiovascular and liver biomarkers compared to ER alone.
We analysed per-protocol data of 90 participants, 31 from the eTRE with ER (eTRE + ER) group, 28 from the lTRE with ER (lTRE + ER) group and 31 from the ER group. As chronotype-adapted diets have already been shown to produce better outcomes than non-adapted ones and in line with real-life behaviour, randomisation was performed on the basis of the individuals’ chronotype. Anthropometric and biochemical measurements for analysis were taken at baseline, and after first and third month of intervention. The primary outcome was mean change in body mass, while the secondary outcomes were mean changes in glycaemic markers (fasting glucose, fasting insulin), indexes of insulin resistance, cardiovascular and liver markers and metabolic hormones (adiponectin, ghrelin, leptin, leptin/ghrelin ratio). Additionally, participant’s subjective appetite was also assessed at baseline and in third month of the intervention.
We confirmed that participants who adhered to eTRE + ER for 3 months showed greater improvements in % of fat mass, BMI, and fasting glucose compared to those in the lTRE + ER and/or ER group. These greater reductions in % of the fat mass and BMI were accompanied by more pronounced decreases in leptin levels, with eTRE + ER showing larger leptin reductions than lTRE + ER or ER. Additionally, the eTRE group showed a significantly greater decrease in desire for food and greater reduction in capacity to eat than ER. However, insulin levels, insulin resistance indexes, lipid profiles, adiponectin, ghrelin, visceral fat indexes, and liver enzymes showed similar changes across all groups.
This analysis showed that eTRE + ER is more effective weight management strategy, while eTRE + ER, lTRE + ER and ER are comparable effective on cardiovascular, liver and insulin resistance markers.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05730231 (NCT05730231, registered on February 6, 2023).
目前尚不清楚在能量限制(ER)基础上增加限时进食(TRE)是否能带来额外的心脏代谢益处,尤其是在代谢激素调节和胰岛素敏感性方面。这项符合方案分析评估了与单独的ER相比,早期TRE(eTRE)或晚期TRE(lTRE)与ER联合使用时,是否能进一步改善胰岛素抵抗指数以及心血管和肝脏生物标志物。
我们分析了90名参与者的符合方案数据,其中31名来自eTRE联合ER(eTRE + ER)组,28名来自lTRE联合ER(lTRE + ER)组,31名来自ER组。由于已证明根据昼夜节律类型调整的饮食比未调整的饮食能产生更好的效果,并且符合现实生活中的行为习惯,因此根据个体的昼夜节律类型进行随机分组。在基线以及干预的第一个月和第三个月后进行用于分析的人体测量和生化测量。主要结局是体重的平均变化,次要结局是血糖标志物(空腹血糖、空腹胰岛素)的平均变化、胰岛素抵抗指数、心血管和肝脏标志物以及代谢激素(脂联素、胃饥饿素、瘦素、瘦素/胃饥饿素比值)的平均变化。此外,还在基线和干预的第三个月评估了参与者的主观食欲。
我们证实,与lTRE + ER和/或ER组的参与者相比,坚持eTRE + ER 3个月的参与者在体脂百分比、体重指数和空腹血糖方面有更大改善。体脂百分比和体重指数的更大降低伴随着瘦素水平更明显的下降,eTRE + ER组的瘦素降低幅度大于lTRE + ER组或ER组。此外,与ER组相比,eTRE组的食物欲望显著降低,进食能力下降幅度更大。然而,所有组的胰岛素水平、胰岛素抵抗指数、血脂谱、脂联素、胃饥饿素、内脏脂肪指数和肝酶均显示出相似的变化。
该分析表明,eTRE + ER是更有效的体重管理策略,而eTRE + ER、lTRE + ER和ER在心血管、肝脏和胰岛素抵抗标志物方面的效果相当。
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05730231(NCT05730231,于2023年2月6日注册)