Habe Bernarda, Črešnovar Tanja, Hladnik Matjaž, Pražnikar Jure, Kenig Saša, Bandelj Dunja, Mohorko Nina, Petelin Ana, Jenko Pražnikar Zala
Faculty of Health Science, University of Primorska, Polje 42, 6310 Izola, Slovenia.
Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Glagoljaška 8, 6000 Koper, Slovenia.
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 10;17(14):2284. doi: 10.3390/nu17142284.
Early time-restricted eating combined with energy restriction (eTRE + ER) has been shown to reduce fat mass, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and fasting glucose more effectively than late TRE with energy restriction (lTRE + ER) or energy restriction (ER) alone. Given the gut microbiome's sensitivity to circadian rhythms, we examined whether adding TRE, particularly eTRE, to ER alters gut microbiota composition beyond ER alone, and whether such effects persist during follow-up. We analysed anthropometric, biochemical and gut microbiome data from 76 participants at baseline and after a 3-month intervention (eTRE + ER: = 33; lTRE + ER: = 23; ER: = 20). Follow-up microbiome data 6-months after the end of intervention were available for 43 participants. Gut microbiota composition was assessed via 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. No significant between-group differences in beta diversity were observed over time. However, changes in alpha diversity differed significantly across groups at the end of the intervention (Shannon: F = 5.72, < 0.001; Simpson: F = 6.72, < 0.001; Richness: F = 3.99, = 0.01) and at follow-up (Richness: F = 3.77, = 0.02). lTRE + ER led to the greatest reductions in diversity post intervention, while ER was least favourable during follow-up. Although no significant between-group differences were observed at the phylum level either at the end of the intervention or during follow-up, only the eTRE + ER group exhibited a significant decrease in Bacillota and an increase in Bacteroidota during follow-up. At the genus level, differential abundance analysis revealed significant shifts in taxa such as , , and other genera within the and families. In the eTRE + ER, and increased, while in other groups decreased. Notably, the changes in were negatively correlated with fasting glucose, while the increase in was inversely associated with DBP; however, both associations were weak in strength. : eTRE + ER may promote beneficial, lasting shifts in the gut microbiome associated with improved metabolic outcomes. These results support further research into personalized TRE strategies for treatment of obesity.
与仅进行能量限制(ER)或能量限制与较晚进食时间限制(lTRE + ER)相比,早期时间限制进食联合能量限制(eTRE + ER)已被证明能更有效地减少脂肪量、舒张压(DBP)和空腹血糖。鉴于肠道微生物群对昼夜节律敏感,我们研究了在能量限制基础上增加进食时间限制,特别是早期进食时间限制(eTRE),是否会改变肠道微生物群组成,以及这种影响在随访期间是否持续存在。我们分析了76名参与者在基线和3个月干预后的人体测量、生化和肠道微生物群数据(eTRE + ER组:n = 33;lTRE + ER组:n = 23;ER组:n = 20)。43名参与者有干预结束后6个月的随访微生物群数据。通过粪便样本的16S rRNA基因测序评估肠道微生物群组成。随着时间的推移,未观察到组间β多样性的显著差异。然而,在干预结束时(香农指数:F = 5.72,P < 0.001;辛普森指数:F = 6.72,P < 0.001;丰富度:F = 3.99,P = 0.01)和随访时(丰富度:F = 3.77,P = 0.02),各组间α多样性的变化存在显著差异。lTRE + ER组干预后多样性下降最大,而ER组在随访期间最不利。尽管在干预结束时或随访期间在门水平未观察到组间显著差异,但只有eTRE + ER组在随访期间芽孢杆菌门显著减少,拟杆菌门增加。在属水平上,差异丰度分析显示了芽孢杆菌科和肠杆菌科内等分类群的显著变化。在eTRE + ER组中,和增加,而在其他组中减少。值得注意的是,的变化与空腹血糖呈负相关,而的增加与舒张压呈负相关;然而,这两种关联的强度都较弱。结论:eTRE + ER可能促进与改善代谢结果相关的肠道微生物群有益且持久的变化。这些结果支持进一步研究针对肥胖治疗的个性化进食时间限制策略。