Cho Su Yeon, Jung Ki Tae
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju 61453, Republic of Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical School, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 1;61(7):1207. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071207.
: Obturator reflex during transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) can cause serious complications, such as bladder perforation, hemorrhage, and incomplete resection. Although obturator nerve block (ONB) is routinely recommended under spinal anesthesia, it is often omitted under general anesthesia (GA) based on the assumption that neuromuscular blockade (NMB) alone prevents adductor muscle contractions. However, clinical observations suggest that the obturator reflex may still occur under deep NMB. This study aimed to determine whether adductor longus muscle (ALM) contraction persists under GA with deep NMB during TURBT. : Thirty patients scheduled for TURBT under GA were prospectively enrolled. A selective ONB was performed under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance. After establishing the baseline current intensity for ALM contraction, neuromuscular monitoring was initiated, and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) was administered. Stimulation thresholds required to induce ALM contraction were sequentially assessed at decreasing Train-of-Four ratio (TOFr) stages (90% to 10%) and Train-of-Four count (TOFc) stages (3 to 0). Final measurements were repeated 1 min after achieving TOFc 0. Changes in stimulation intensity were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM). : As NMB deepened, the current intensity required to provoke ALM contraction progressively increased: 0.51 ± 0.25 mA at TOFr 90%, 1.66 ± 0.53 mA at TOFr 10%, 2.04 ± 0.66 mA at TOFc 0, and 2.61 ± 0.29 mA at 1 min after TOFc 0. Notably, all patients demonstrated ALM contraction at TOFc 0 and thereafter, confirming the persistence of the obturator reflex despite complete NMB. LMM analysis revealed a significant trend of increasing stimulation thresholds with progressive NMB depth (β = 0.133, < 0.001). : Adductor muscle contractions in response to obturator nerve stimulation persist even under deep NMB. These findings raise concerns that deep NMB alone may be insufficient to prevent obturator reflex and suggest that ONB should be considered as an adjunctive practice during TURBT under GA in patients at risk.
经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TURBT)期间的闭孔神经反射可导致严重并发症,如膀胱穿孔、出血和切除不完全。尽管在脊髓麻醉下常规推荐进行闭孔神经阻滞(ONB),但在全身麻醉(GA)下通常会省略,因为假定仅神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)就能防止内收肌收缩。然而,临床观察表明,在深度NMB下闭孔神经反射仍可能发生。本研究旨在确定在TURBT期间全身麻醉且深度NMB下内收长肌(ALM)收缩是否持续存在。
30例计划在全身麻醉下进行TURBT的患者被前瞻性纳入研究。在超声和神经刺激器引导下进行选择性ONB。在确定ALM收缩的基线电流强度后,开始神经肌肉监测,并给予罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg)。在四个成串刺激比率(TOFr)降低阶段(90%至10%)和四个成串刺激计数(TOFc)阶段(3至0)依次评估诱导ALM收缩所需的刺激阈值。在达到TOFc 0后1分钟重复进行最终测量。使用线性混合效应模型(LMM)分析刺激强度的变化。
随着NMB加深,诱发ALM收缩所需的电流强度逐渐增加:TOFr 90%时为0.51±0.25mA,TOFr 10%时为1.66±0.53mA,TOFc 0时为2.04±0.66mA,TOFc 0后1分钟时为2.61±0.29mA。值得注意的是,所有患者在TOFc 0及之后均表现出ALM收缩,证实尽管NMB完全,但闭孔神经反射仍持续存在。LMM分析显示,随着NMB深度增加,刺激阈值有显著升高趋势(β = 0.133,P < 0.001)。
即使在深度NMB下,对闭孔神经刺激的内收肌收缩仍持续存在。这些发现引发了人们对仅深度NMB可能不足以预防闭孔神经反射的担忧,并表明在全身麻醉下对有风险的患者进行TURBT期间,应考虑将ONB作为辅助措施。