• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病人及其保险公司在过失及其他民事诉讼中的责任。

Liability of the mentally ill and their insurers in negligence and other civil actions.

作者信息

Perr I N

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;142(12):1414-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.12.1414.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.142.12.1414
PMID:4073303
Abstract

Although familiar with the insanity defense, psychiatrists know little about the liability of mentally ill persons in civil actions or the secondary liability of their insurers. Generally the mentally ill are responsible civilly for their actions regardless of mental state except where the law requires specific intent and the illness negates such intent. Psychiatrists and other mental health workers may thus have grounds for suit against patients who injure them. While insurance coverage may exclude intentional acts, insurers may be civilly liable, even for blatant criminal acts. The author reviews the relevant laws and presents illustrative case examples.

摘要

尽管精神病医生对精神错乱辩护很熟悉,但他们对精神病患者在民事诉讼中的责任或其保险公司的次要责任知之甚少。一般来说,精神病患者无论精神状态如何,都要对自己的行为承担民事责任,除非法律要求有特定意图而该疾病否定了这种意图。因此,精神病医生和其他心理健康工作者可能有理由起诉伤害他们的患者。虽然保险范围可能排除故意行为,但保险公司可能承担民事责任,即使是公然的犯罪行为。作者回顾了相关法律并列举了说明性案例。

相似文献

1
Liability of the mentally ill and their insurers in negligence and other civil actions.精神病人及其保险公司在过失及其他民事诉讼中的责任。
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;142(12):1414-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.12.1414.
2
Civil liability of mentally ill persons.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):617-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.617.
3
The insanity defense: the case for abolition.精神错乱辩护:废除的理由。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;36(1):51-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.1.51.
4
The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.精神错乱辩护:废除该辩护的影响未得到道德共识的支持。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Winter;9(4):471-500.
5
The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.精神病人的损害赔偿民事责任。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2008;45(4):285-90.
6
Criminal Forensic Psychiatry: A Primer for Psychiatrists.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;77(6):e745. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11069tx1c.
7
Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.审判权利与精神药物:反对在审判期间对被告进行非自愿药物治疗的案例。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002;55(1):165-218.
8
Psychiatry and the criminal justice system: testing the myths.
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 May;145(5):605-10. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.5.605.
9
Elimination of the exculpatory insanity rule. A modern societal need.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1983 Dec;6(4):611-27.
10
Law & psychiatry: Responsibility for torts: should the courts continue to ignore mental illness?法律与精神病学:侵权责任:法院是否应继续无视精神疾病?
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Apr;63(4):308-10. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20120p308.