Pereira Emiliane L, Strayer Thomas E, Harden Samantha M, Glasgow Russell E, Studts Christina, Estabrooks Paul A, Huebschmann Amy G
University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Omaha, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Pulmonary Circulation Center, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun 18;9(1):e146. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10070. eCollection 2025.
Our overall goal was to enhance the usability and interactivity of the RE-AIM website (re-aim.org) and improve resources to support the application of the RE-AIM framework within the context of dissemination & implementation (D&I) research and practice.
We applied a mixed-methods approach to obtain user feedback from 24 D&I researchers and practitioners. Usability (System Usability Scale) and interactivity (Interactivity Scale) were assessed through validated surveys, at baseline and after two iterative rounds of website modifications (Phase 1 and Phase 2). We also conducted qualitative assessments at each phase.
Qualitative baseline and Phase 1 findings indicated a need to simplify organization, enhance information accessibility, provide concrete guidance on applying RE-AIM, and clarify contextual factors related to RE-AIM constructs. After streamlining website and homepage organization, Phase 2 qualitative results suggested improved user navigation experience; users also requested greater interactivity. Modifications included: new interactive planning tool and a video introduction of contextual factors influencing RE-AIM outcomes. Significant improvements were found in the SUS score from baseline to Phase 1(64.2[SD18.7] to 80.8 [SD 12.1] ( < .05) and remained higher in Phase 2(77.1[SD 15] ( = 0.08). Interactivity also improved from baseline to Phase 2(3.5[SD1.2] to 41[0.9], though not statistically significant.
User-centered feedback on online resources, as exemplified by this use case example of enhancements to the RE-AIM website, are important in bridging the gap between research and practice, and the revised website should be more accessible and useful to users.
我们的总体目标是提高RE-AIM网站(re-aim.org)的可用性和交互性,并改进资源,以支持在传播与实施(D&I)研究及实践背景下应用RE-AIM框架。
我们采用混合方法从24名D&I研究人员和从业者那里获取用户反馈。通过经过验证的调查,在基线以及两轮网站迭代修改(第1阶段和第2阶段)之后,评估可用性(系统可用性量表)和交互性(交互性量表)。我们还在每个阶段进行了定性评估。
定性的基线和第1阶段结果表明,需要简化组织架构、提高信息可获取性、提供应用RE-AIM的具体指导,并阐明与RE-AIM构建相关的背景因素。在精简网站和主页组织之后,第2阶段的定性结果显示用户导航体验有所改善;用户还要求提高交互性。修改内容包括:新的交互式规划工具以及一段关于影响RE-AIM结果的背景因素的视频介绍。从基线到第1阶段,系统可用性量表(SUS)得分有显著提高(从64.2[标准差18.7]提高到80.8[标准差12.1],P<0.05),在第2阶段仍保持较高水平(77.1[标准差15],P = 0.08)。从基线到第2阶段,交互性也有所改善(从3.5[标准差1.2]提高到4.1[标准差0.9]),尽管无统计学意义。
以这个RE-AIM网站增强功能的用例为例,以用户为中心的在线资源反馈对于弥合研究与实践之间的差距很重要,并且修订后的网站对用户应该更易访问且更有用。