Aljafen Bandar Nasser, Alqahtani Reem Nafel, Algarni Reem Saeed, Elmutawi Hend, Bahr Mohamed Hamdy
Bandar Nasser Aljafen Department of Medicine (Neurology Unit), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Reem Nafel Alqahtani Department of Adult Neurology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSHRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):1930-1936. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.11981.
This study aimed to investigate neurologists' perceptions and practices regarding generic antiepileptic medications (AEDs) in the management of epilepsy, and whether generic AEDs can be used as a satisfactory, effective, and safe substitute for brand-name medications in targeted patients.
This questionnaire based cross-sectional study was performed in the Department of Medicine (Neurology Division), College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from July 2022 to July 2024. One hundred thirty neuro physicians participated, and 114 completed the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 87.7%. The participants consisted of 63.2% males and 36.8% females. The questions were based on a 3-point Likert scale.
The results revealed that all four components were strongly and positively correlated with each other: the 'Patient Miscontrol with Generic AEDs' component had a statistically significant strong positive correlation with 'concern About Generic AEDs' component, r(114) = 0.654, p < 0.0005; with 'Aversion to Generic AEDs' component, r(114) = 0.525, p < 0.0005; and 'Withholding Generic AEDs' component, r(114) = 0.595, p < 0.0005. 'Concern About Generic AEDs' component had a statistically significant strong positive correlation with the 'Aversion to Generic AEDs' component, r (114) = 0.538, p < 0.0005; and the 'Withholding Generic AEDs' component, r (114) = 0.459, p < 0.0005. Finally, the 'Aversion to Generic AEDs' component showed a statistically significant positive correlation with the 'Withholding Generic AEDs' component, r (114) = 0.435, p < 0.0005. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between years of experience and 'Withholding Generic AEDs;' r (114) = 0.243, p = 0.009. The post hoc analysis revealed statistically significant differences between the low-experienced '< 5 years' (66.50) and the high-experienced '> 10 years' (100.00) groups (p = 0.014).
Half of the neurologists participating in the study are concerned about substituting brand-name antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with generic ones. Neurologists had mixed perceptions regarding the use of generic AEDs for cost-saving purposes and the safety of substituting brand-name medications with generics. We encourage reporting every incident of seizure in patients on generic AEDs.
本研究旨在调查神经科医生在癫痫管理中对通用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的看法和做法,以及通用AEDs是否可作为目标患者中品牌药物的令人满意、有效且安全的替代品。
这项基于问卷调查的横断面研究于2022年7月至2024年7月在沙特阿拉伯利雅得国王沙特大学医学院内科(神经科)进行。130名神经科医生参与,114人完成问卷,回复率为87.7%。参与者中男性占63.2%,女性占36.8%。问题基于3点李克特量表。
结果显示,所有四个组成部分之间都存在强烈的正相关:“通用AEDs导致患者控制不佳”组成部分与“对通用AEDs的担忧”组成部分具有统计学意义的强正相关,r(114)=0.654,p<0.0005;与“对通用AEDs的厌恶”组成部分,r(114)=0.525,p<0.0005;以及“不使用通用AEDs”组成部分,r(114)=0.595,p<0.0005。“对通用AEDs的担忧”组成部分与“对通用AEDs的厌恶”组成部分具有统计学意义的强正相关,r(114)=0.538,p<0.0005;与“不使用通用AEDs”组成部分,r(114)=0.459,p<0.0005。最后,“对通用AEDs的厌恶”组成部分与“不使用通用AEDs”组成部分显示出统计学意义的正相关,r(114)=0.435,p<0.0005。Spearman相关性分析显示经验年限与“不使用通用AEDs”之间存在正相关;r(114)=0.243,p=0.009。事后分析显示经验不足“<5年”(66.50)和经验丰富“>10年”(100.00)组之间存在统计学意义的差异(p=0.014)。
参与研究的神经科医生中有一半担心用通用抗癫痫药物替代品牌抗癫痫药物(AEDs)。神经科医生对为节省成本而使用通用AEDs以及用通用药物替代品牌药物的安全性看法不一。我们鼓励报告服用通用AEDs患者的每一次癫痫发作事件。