Suppr超能文献

小鼠口服18α-甘草次酸和18β-甘草次酸的抗过敏作用及药代动力学

Anti-allergic actions and pharmacokinetics of orally administered 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid in mice.

作者信息

Nose Mitsuhiko, Fukaya Cheri, Hisaka Shinsuke

机构信息

Department of Pharmacognosy, Graduate School of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 468-8503, Japan.

Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 468-8503, Japan.

出版信息

J Nat Med. 2025 Sep;79(5):1236-1242. doi: 10.1007/s11418-025-01941-3. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Abstract

In this study, we explored the anti-allergic actions of 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid and 18β-glycyrrhetinic acids (18α-GA and 18β-GA), to compare the pharmacological properties of these stereoisomers and to clarify the immunopharmacological contribution of 18α-glycyrrhizin in licorice. 18β-GA exhibited anti-allergic effects in murine models of contact dermatitis and IgE-mediated immediate allergic dermatitis, whereas 18α-GA showed no such effects. To elucidate the mechanism underlying this variation, the blood concentrations of 18α-GA and 18β-GA were measured after the oral administration of both compounds; we detected only 18β-GA in sera. We also demonstrated that considerable amounts of 18α-GA remained in the small intestine, which indicates low absorption of 18α-GA from the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, 18α-GA, like 18β-GA, directly suppressed IgE-mediated degranulation in RBL-2H3, and both showed equivalent clearance after intravenous administration. In conclusion, 18α-GA was not absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract in mice and did not exhibit the anti-allergic actions exhibited by 18β-GA. To clarify the differences in absorbability between these two compounds further research focusing on the gastrointestinal absorption of 18β-GA is needed.

摘要

在本研究中,我们探究了18α-甘草次酸和18β-甘草次酸(18α-GA和18β-GA)的抗过敏作用,以比较这些立体异构体的药理特性,并阐明18α-甘草酸在甘草中的免疫药理学作用。18β-GA在接触性皮炎和IgE介导的速发型过敏性皮炎小鼠模型中表现出抗过敏作用,而18α-GA则未表现出此类作用。为阐明这种差异的潜在机制,在口服这两种化合物后测量了18α-GA和18β-GA的血药浓度;我们在血清中仅检测到18β-GA。我们还证明,相当数量的18α-GA保留在小肠中,这表明18α-GA从胃肠道的吸收较低。此外,18α-GA与18β-GA一样,直接抑制RBL-2H3中IgE介导的脱颗粒,并且两者在静脉注射后表现出等效的清除率。总之,18α-GA在小鼠中未通过胃肠道吸收,也未表现出18β-GA所具有的抗过敏作用。为进一步阐明这两种化合物在吸收性上的差异,需要针对18β-GA的胃肠道吸收开展进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验